Innocent civilians in Iraq, Japan, and Vieques can attest to the fact the U.S.A. "doesn't" use them. LOL! , No we just sell them to people like Saddam Hussein and others, and then have the nerve to get upset when do as we do, and that is, commit genocide
2007-04-04 16:42:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely!
WMD's don't kill people...people kill people.
We should "give" nuclear, biological and chemical weapons to every nation in the world that wants them. It is, after all, only fair!
One has only to look at history to see all the times that the United States has used nuclear, biological and chemical weapons to take out entire cities and cultures.
lol
2007-04-04 16:52:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Though I agree that the USA should lead by example, I disagree with the genocide comment.
The USA embarked on preemptive strikes in both Afghanistan and Iraq. In neither case was it meant to wipe them out, in any way, but merely to stomp out the threat coming from those countries(even though people argue the USA had a lot to do with the formation of said threat, but that does not mean that their reasoning is less valid).
The USA had a big blow in 911 and the people needed to believe they had power over this, to stop it from happening again, they needed to take action. Afghanistan was first, and Iraq was second. If it was genocide the USA could've simply just nuked them and been done with it.
The outcome of these battles has not been what was expected, but few battles end with happiness.
Basically, the USA does seem to try to do the right thing, but the followthrough can be bad.
As for weapons, in the end they're tools, in the right hands they can be useful, in the wrong ones they can decimate.
2007-04-07 10:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by Luis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I despise the term "weapons of Mass Destruction". call them what they're. Nuclear, organic and organic and Chemical weapons. considering the fact that we don't use organic and organic and Chemical (previous CS/Tear gas), I take it you advise Nuclear weapons. the quick answer is specific! Obama is all approximately disarmament. Disarm you, disarm me, disarm the U. S.. this is Jimmy Carter BS. It replaced right into a disaster then, and is much extra so now. a minimum of the Soviet Union had some ethics. Iran and Islamic terrorists have NONE. Brimming with religious ecstasy, they gleefully objective and homicide harmless men, women individuals and young little ones. If one will rigidity a motor vehicle packed with severe explosives right into a identifying to purchase industry, then one will rigidity a nuke into downtown vast apple. with a bit of luck, leaders who might have get right of entry to to nukes (President Ahmadinejad), could think of interior the direction of the outcomes a sprint extra in the event that they knew they knew their united states of america might desire to be became to glass. i'm no longer giving up my weapons because of fact the criminals are not giving up theirs. with out them, i'm defensless against them. Giving up our nukes could depart us on the mercy of our enemies.
2016-10-21 01:47:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They havent used them in offensive wars, and are for defense, I have no guilt for hiroshima, I wasnt even born yet, and from what I understand , Japan snuck the war in and I have seen the ORIGINAL headlines of " Japan hits pearl harbor" from an original american newspaper in Michigan, and its red , black, and white !! Not just black and white.
I dont know if any NUKES or atomic bombs are OKAY in any country. I have to say , I dont think its okay. I think nuclear energy, and nuclear bombs are deadly to ALL OF HUMANITY and ALL OF EARTH !!
2007-04-04 16:52:08 · answer #4 · answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The U.S. has always had a double standard, I am not saying that is not hypocritical, that is just the way it is. Our government will never give up it's weapons programs, and who would dare try to make them?
2007-04-04 16:52:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What tabloids have your been reading - we've sold arms to them but never sold wmd's to anyone... you really needed to let me know where your getting your information
2007-04-08 20:18:28 · answer #6 · answered by hifeemikey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Especially when we have apocalyptic fundies more closer to the reins of the government than ever, truly unsettling.
2007-04-04 16:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no we are responsible with our WMD wait we are the only country ever to nuke someone and we did the little shock and awe campaign
2007-04-04 16:54:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whats ya talking about?
2007-04-04 16:46:35 · answer #9 · answered by TE 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i totally understand where you're coming from.
2007-04-11 13:45:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋