Just curious. Liberals have a history of commiting acts of cowardice during wartime. Clinton's Black Hawk Down failure that emboldened Osama Bin Laden to attack us is a perfect example - what say you?
Before you answer - be advised - you have to answer the question without making any references to George W Bush, the current administration, or trying to attack me or my character because you can't support your argument with facts.
In case you attended a liberally run public school and can't read -- This is a question about Hillary Clinton and what she would do if America is attacked on her watch. Try to answer the question please - I know it will be hard for you liberals to do but could you please try?
2007-04-04
16:36:54
·
19 answers
·
asked by
andyandy28227
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Um Anthony...the Black Hawk Down incident occured on October 3rd 1993 - who was President then? http://inquirer.philly.com/packages/somalia/nov16/rang16.asp
2007-04-04
16:49:16 ·
update #1
Wrenchintheworks - Porn? Why yes! Thanks to liberals like you who protect things like porn in the public library under so called free speech rights - I am free to view it if I so choose! Thanks for the suggestion but I'll pass!
2007-04-04
16:52:34 ·
update #2
Harry - Yes Truman was a Democrat - but you libs have to go all the way back to World War 2 to find a Democrat that won't wet their pants and call for surrender at the first sign of trouble. There are no Democrats like Truman left in the Democrat party...
2007-04-04
16:59:40 ·
update #3
So, GoHillary - What would lead you to that conclusion? Would calling for our retreat from the battlefield (like she's doing now) be considered a "logical plan" by you? God help us...
2007-04-04
17:02:43 ·
update #4
Brian2412 - it's not a rant, it's a question - Hillary is calling for our retreat from the battlefield - her husband retreated from Somalia and emboldend Osama to attack us - these are facts. Liberal ideas for running the country suck. Deal with it.
2007-04-04
17:06:35 ·
update #5
realst1 - Liberals ARE cowards they constantly talk about surrendering in Iraq even though they use slick words like redeploy, withdraw, pull-out. They want to surrender. Plain and simple. I don't hear of any conservatives being quoted on al-jezeera saying they want to surrender. Do you?
2007-04-04
17:12:58 ·
update #6
If she is able to buy her presidency, she will invest in a burqa. Hilliam adapts. Hilliam appeases. Hilliam is sooo flexible.
Actually, I think she will fight wearing a burqa. I think she has something to prove. It's a woman's thing. If you give Hill Clinton guns, she'll shoot to show her women's lib strength. She's cold blooded. Enough people have died since she and Bill have had any kind of power. That's where her cowardice reigns. She only wants power because she could take it.
After her show of force, her natural lib cowardice will resurface. The burqa goes on.
2007-04-04 17:15:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why could a girl President of the U. S. make any distinction? she would be in a position to probably have a male Secretary of State who's the guy the middle East Muslem Republics could be coping with besides. With the nevertheless OPEN borders it is obtainable to have an attack earlier Hillary takes workplace. I say that because of the fact Bush has completed no longer something to make certain the border is closed and neocons presume Hillary is approximately to take the enormous chair any minute now even however no caucus or familiar has even been held no longer to point a regularly occurring election.
2016-11-07 06:22:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think she will put on a burqa and fly a white flag over the white house for saudi arabian embassy ! Then they will all run in, rape her, and they will then hang her in times square off a crane ( like they do in iran) for being raped !
Or maybe they will stone her ??
actually, really, I dont know what she would do. Had I been the president , saudi arabia wouldnt exist in the same way today, im female, so who knows what she would do..hopefully fight like hell to do what is best for her nation. I think maybe she could plan a war,,,,,,,I know I could. It would have been over a long time ago, and it would not have been in Iraq.
2007-04-04 16:44:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
if we were attacked under Hilary, she would indeed back
off, and blame her predecessor no matter how far into her
administration. Liberals do not use facts or logic, only
emotion, that's why they are so dangerous in matters of
power and policy. God help us if she ever does come to
power. She will put her personal agenda before national
security.
2007-04-04 17:04:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elizabeth P 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Right out of the box, she would blame Bush for lapses in his Administration that led to the defeat. She would cite his failure to aggressively pursue the War on Terror in Iraq and Afghanistan, which she voted for, and his failure to implement the Patriot Act as she intended.
She would then convert to Islam, get fitted for her burqa, and become the first president of the Islamic States of America.
2007-04-04 16:42:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Hillary, always the fashionista, will get fitted for her couture burka first. I think she's having Versace and Armani draw up some samples for her right now.
2007-04-04 16:56:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Exactly what a logical, educated, informed, qualified and honorable Commander-In-Chief would do. Protect America with a logical plan without the ego.
2007-04-04 16:45:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Great ploy. Claim that liberals commit acts of cowardice, make up a story that supports this claim and then have a rule that you can't answer citing the numerous acts of conservative and republican cowardice.
Karl, is that you?
2007-04-04 16:43:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by realst1 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
First - I am not a liberal ..I have to agree with the Democrat political analyst who wished to remain anonymous . " Does she really think we're that stupid"?
2007-04-04 16:44:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
This is hypothetical, not a real question so do not impose rules for your diatribe.
If Regan and other succeeding Republicans did not arm both Saddam and Bin Laden we would not be in this mess now.
Ever think of that.
Oh wait, I said think... Another hypothetical!
2007-04-04 16:43:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
3⤊
3⤋