English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what will liberals say about Bush then?
He is going to end terrorism. Thats the whole point of the war on terror.

2007-04-04 14:52:15 · 12 answers · asked by Handsome Boy Modeling School 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

I think that sounds like a dream. It's impossible to eliminate terrorizm. It's like trying to say you are going to wipe out crime. It can't happen. For every terrorist we kill - there is a new one waiting to take their place- and they will be more motivated and leathal because they will be angry that they are being exterminated. I'm not saying "stop the war on terror" - I'm just saying it's a war that will never end, like the war on drugs or crime - there's just too many of them to wipe out.

Crime, Terror, Drugs, and Prostituion - impossible to wipe them out. But it's nice to have hope.

2007-04-04 15:18:33 · answer #1 · answered by f w 4 · 0 0

Does anyone besides me understand the war on terror is a generational war? One that will not be "ended" under one President??? Bush will be remembered for shouting, screaming about a problem that everyone ignored. Address terrorism now, or later. It just depends on how many dead Americans you would like to use.

2007-04-04 15:01:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Sorry to say but, terrorism will never come to an end. As you can see everytime a group is stopped another group appears to take its place, so the war on terrorism is meaningless just as the war on drugs.

2007-04-04 15:02:43 · answer #3 · answered by DRANO 1 · 2 0

If a guy is evil, committing undesirable damaging acts against hazard unfastened people in a remote places land then runs like a coward and stands interior the lower back of girls people and childrens he says he's making an attempt to guard, it truly is he now no longer those he committed the acts against that's inflicting the killings. All that had to be comprehensive to stay removed from this undesirable conflict replace into to bypass lower back the lads that have been illegally abducted and bypass away Israel on my very own. That the cowards purely isn't waiting to do. yet they might take a seat down decrease lower back and cry whilst they lose a point their finger at those they first attacked announcing "look worldwide hoe evil Israel is" it truly is the Islamic terrorist and those that help them that could desire to take accountability for those deaths....Jim

2016-11-26 03:09:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Terrorism is a technique, not a movement. You know, blow up things and civilians. Terrorism has been around in one form or another for centuries and will continue to be around.

Were you born stupid or did you have to practice?

2007-04-04 14:57:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

listen...

Reagan was twice the man Bush is...

and drugs were an easier problem than terrorism...

and as far as I can tell, Ronnie's war on drugs failed, I still see some drugs around... in fact, apparently they are quite popular in Afghanistan, where we are fighting the war on terror, ironically...

wars on ideas rarely seem to work...

2007-04-04 15:00:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Half of Germans think Bush is the problem

2007-04-04 14:56:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

bush will be gone, because he will have been eliminated!

hey g...our economy is dependent on the drug trade. its not just a myth that the cia imports drugs. I am in the gis industry, and anybody who knows this science well knows that we have the technology to stop all drug imports, but they don't utilize it.

2007-04-04 15:08:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

one man cannot end terrorism. get a grip.

2007-04-04 15:00:06 · answer #9 · answered by tamboz 3 · 2 0

The libs will move on to other things like advocating rights for child molesters.

2007-04-04 15:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers