Looks like Madam Speaker and the Syrians got more diplomacy done in 3 days than Bush has in 6 years.
2007-04-04 13:34:47 · 14 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I meant Pelosi and Syria.
2007-04-04 13:35:05 · update #1
Oh I can't wait to hear Fat Man Rushes take on this. Oh wait yes I can. I never turn him on. The Cons are so brainwashed they will never admit that diplomacy has a chance. Blow up the world.
You are either with us or against us.
2007-04-04 13:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by trichbopper 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yeah-Pelosi with NO foreign diplomacy experience did it all by herself. Or maybe it was because Bush sent the USS Nimitz to the gulf? Hmmmmm? A woman negotiating with a regime that holds women in such high regards..........or a nuclear-powered multimission aircraft carrier steaming towards the gulf? Which would you find more 'persuasive' for releasing hostages?
Good question. We all need to think this one over!
2007-04-05 02:12:54 · answer #2 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sure, the hostages have been released 20 minutes after reagan's inauguration so there replaced into some thing weird and wonderful there. on the time, a lot of human beings concept Reagan scared Iran into liberating the hostages jointly because it variety of feels to me the begotiation replaced into extra because of Carter. the two way, Reagan got here in reliable with some "political capital" which he spent...lots of his policies are much like George W's immediately. Tax cuts, extensive deficits, even the way he dealt with the press(the teflon president, they noted as Reagan)-he hardly spoke back questions yet deflected them along with his "right down to earth" demeanor-a comedian tale and a grin. extremely some allegations have been remodeled the years on the subject of a deal between the Reagan kitchen cabinet and Iran, as a fashion to postpone the launch of the hostages until after the U. S. election of 1980. even however Senate and residing house investigations interior the Nineties declared the allegations to be unfounded, the conspiracy's existence or lack thereof keeps to be a concern of dialogue. the ideal nature of the allegations lies in a skill violation of the international commerce Acts of 1798 which limit any inner maximum citizen or occasion from negotiating with a remote places skill in concerns of national coverage or militia action. that's claimed by political fighters that the Reagan marketing campaign, or certainly one of his election marketing campaign staffers, communicated with the Iranian government and asked them to amplify the hostage disaster long adequate to verify that he gained the 1980 elections. the main reason for inquiry replaced into the seeming accident of his inauguration and the hostages' launch on an identical day, twentieth January 1981
2016-10-21 01:25:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were released because we had a few aircraft carriers in the area, pointing big guns at them, and had sanctions about to take place that would have seen them release the hostages. Also the release of the 5 Iranian hostgages we had, Idiot! Pelosi only reassured those aholes that we are weak, and send women to beg for us. Now, they will try again.Believe it.
2007-04-04 13:47:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol
I wondered how long it would take before someone on the left attempted to give Pelosi credit for the release of the Brits!
Your factual basis would be?
2007-04-04 13:49:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nah, here's my spin.... Ahmabadjob or whatever his name is knows that the best way to defeat America is by allowing the Liberals to take over. Go hard line against any Republican (Rice) and fold like a wet napkin for any Democrat (Pelosi).
Chamberlain/Hitler ring a bell?
2007-04-04 13:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
That is not relevant. Speaker Pelosi and the other Congressmen with her violated the Constitution. Diplomacy is the duty of the executive branch.
2007-04-04 13:41:35 · answer #7 · answered by desotobrave 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
no it was the release of the 5 captive Iranians in Iraq by the US
2007-04-04 13:45:06 · answer #8 · answered by a person of interest 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How do you figure that?
And you have no problem with Pelosi thwarting the US Constitution?
Read it
ADD: Its great to answer a question in a legal way and point to the US Constitution to support our view and get a thumbs down. I will assume (safe bet that it is) the thumbs down were by liberals who have never and will never read it.
2007-04-04 13:39:06 · answer #9 · answered by jonepemberton 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Pelosi was in Syria dumb**s!!!!
She was making deals with a terrorist supporting nation.
She should be held and tried on charges of treason!
2007-04-04 13:41:07 · answer #10 · answered by Delphi 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋