He isn't a religious man like George Bush is.
2007-04-04 13:24:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Because he knows the Bible would more than likely catch on fire, He is a complete liar and troublemaker to take CIA Agent and cop her out, put a risk just because her husband told the truth that Iraq had no weapons are trying to get weapons. She has a family for 20 years she led a double life for her country and yet that little pip squeak ruined her life and she could be killed any day while that sorry bunch in the White House wanted to get even with husband. Just like a bunch first graders is what that White has a bunch no good liars and mongers. They should all be chained together and frog hopped out the White House doors and kicked to the side for the trash man to pick them up and throw in with all the other maggoots eating filthy trash.
2007-04-04 13:36:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
oh stunning. as though a Christian laying his hand on a Bible insures reality would be counseled or a vow is truthfully no longer broken. GW Bush, the Christian's political messiah, placed his hand on a Bible and vowed to guard and shelter the form and then went stunning to paintings dismantling that's each meaning and utilising the products for bathing room paper. WWJT? ... Who could Jesus Torture?
2016-10-21 01:22:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My theory is that Karl Rove is an agent of Satan and would probably burst into flame or turn to dust if he had to put his hand on a bible.
2007-04-04 13:29:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Resident Heretic 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
That's laughable ... cons and bibles don't mix. When a con politician thumps a bible in order to solicit the vote of evangelicals, the bible is the word of God and the most sacred scripture.
When a con president puts his hands on a bible and swears to uphold and protect the Constituion of the United States, the same bible is meaningless because the same president can legislate well beyond the boundaries of the same Constitution ... especially when it suits a republican cause. In addition, the same evangelicals act like this is ok and nothing bad is happening.
So what is it conservatives? Is the bible really sacred or is it a self-servng tool for republican whims?
2007-04-04 13:27:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by HillBillieNot 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Rove has a lot to hide. He is the sleaziest operator in the sleazy Bush Administration. If he were to put his hand on the bible, his skin would burn and he would be consumed in a ball of fire.
2007-04-04 13:27:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Where is your complaint about Sandy Berger.? He was supposed to take a lie detector to account for all the documents he stole from the national archives.
These prosecutors serve at the pleasure of the president. Remember when Clinton fired all of his? or When the white house travel office was fired by WJC
2007-04-04 13:28:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Luchador 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Karl Rove is an atheist. It would be meaningless to him.
2007-04-04 14:24:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The president doesnt have to let the members of the executive branch testify before congress. Democrats are trying to make a mockery of the president and he wont let it happen. This whole thing is being blown way out of proportion.
Remember Clinton fired 93/94 Attorneys bush fired 8/94
2007-04-04 13:24:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Calvin T 2
·
5⤊
3⤋
the President does have to make his aides testify (or at least take the 5th) if there is a reason to suspect behavior that is criminal or against the rules in place to ensure that government is honest...it's called oversight and it is absolutely in Congress' power to exercise oversight
2007-04-04 13:41:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is so funny. Do you really think that swearing a oath to god matters one iota to these men. I think they should put Rove through a little water torture to get the truth.
2007-04-04 13:24:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by trichbopper 4
·
2⤊
3⤋