English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Request to Board of Directors to make available to all shareholders within six months of the annual meeting, a written report on Lockheed Martin's depleted uranium and other nuclear weapons related involvement, excluding confidential and proprietary information.

Note: Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

2007-04-04 12:02:15 · 4 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7 in Business & Finance Corporations

I am exercising my voting rights as a shareholder in Lockheed ... this is a question they've asked me ... I'm just expanding my research a little before I vote.

2007-04-04 12:11:24 · update #1

4 answers

No, they should not. I vote against the proposal too.

2007-04-04 12:05:58 · answer #1 · answered by poor_broke_investor 3 · 0 0

I consistently theory that being sane became comparable to being pregnant. You both are or you aren't from now on. i'm no longer certain how the "completely" matches in the following. i ought to prefer to allow you to comprehend that i imagine it exhibits he's insane, yet that does no longer be the fact. The Bush administration has, on the grounds that 911, operated effectively on the theory of inspiring concern. This premise contributed to the knee-jerk reaction of the congress in helping and passing the "patriot act" and it has worked exceedingly properly for them/him on the grounds that then. Now he's stuck in an embarassing mission. on the instant he defined that he were instructed extremely some months in the past that there became some new intel, yet that it mandatory to be looked at for accuracy, and that he became merely given this suggestion various days in the past. ok, so as meaning at the same time as the President is instructed that there is a few new (meaning 'diverse') intel, he would not ask for no less than a cursory review? Who in the international will have self assurance that! So now, as a political candidate is obligated to do, he tries to spin this round to make it sound like...yeah, it is what i have been sayin all alongside." it really is pathetic and it really is embarrassing to everybody with 0.5 a mind. notwithstanding, i imagine the yankee public's brilliant gullibility makes human beings like George Bush have self assurance they could say some thing and the individuals will have self assurance it. So possibly the more advantageous perfect question is this: Are individuals mainly no longer completely sane?

2016-12-03 07:15:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Gee, do you have a problem with Lockheed Martin????? Also, you are not posting a question, you are posting a statement. Why don't you take your battle axe to a political chat room?

2007-04-04 12:06:03 · answer #3 · answered by zeebarista 5 · 1 1

You bore me.

2007-04-04 12:05:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers