English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this the inevitable future of terrorism that will stop at nothing?

2007-04-04 11:22:44 · 16 answers · asked by Andy C 2 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

I believe that it is inevitable. Not necessarily on US soil, but somewhere of mass population in the World Leading countries. The nuclear weapon is an awesome weapon and is rather small. It is not easily transported these days, but a small bomb could cause major damage.

The primary reason that I think it will happen is that there are some people that are insistent that human life is not very sacred if they do not believe the same way. I cannot say that we are much better in some cases.

To answer your question directly, I think that it is a good possibility some day. Humanity keeps growing and I would hope that our nature keeps improving as we go. I would love to think that we are getting smarter as an entire race and that we can someday look well beyond our petty religious differences.

2007-04-04 11:41:41 · answer #1 · answered by theriospendragon 2 · 1 1

Sometimes it's a little tricky to see who the real terrorist are.

One source of mine stated that the Mossad will use a fishing vessel to bring a 10 megaton atomic bomb into South Carolina's harbor. There they will try and off load it onto a truck. Then they will drive to a very heavily populated area and detonate it.

Bush will declare Marshall Law and remain in office.
Osama Bin Laden will take credit with a confession tape.
Inside sources will come forward stating that Iran has been harboring Osama Bin Laden for the last 5 years. Bush will retaliate and set off 3 or 4 large nukes on Iran. China and North Korea will join in. The end result?

To reduce the earth's population down to just 1 billion people and maintain it at that level. I guess they have been planning this for the last 30 years. They call it "culling." You might want to store up some cannned food and water.

2007-04-04 23:08:30 · answer #2 · answered by Ugly Betty 3 · 1 0

If we have a bad President and members of congress that don't protect our country, then yes we will have a nuclear bomb blow up some of our American cities. There are too many terrorist and mentally ill people running around the USA. Only God can help us if we pray hard enough.

2007-04-04 11:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by mandm 5 · 2 1

I think that if once we pull out of Iraq without a stable middle east, then I'm sure Al-Queda will stop at nothing to make deals with Iran or whatever country they can to use whatever technology they have to blow up LA, Chicago, NYC, and DC. All the major cities'll probably blow up, and all these peace loving hippies that want out of Iraq'll be all up in arms asking why we pulled out of there in the first place, and the first person asking is Nancy Pelosi. The Dems only want what they think we all want and whatever is on their agenda. The Republicans are the same way. Once we let our guard down, and we ignore the real issues over there, which is terrorist and all who are against America in general, then we may have a problem on our hands.

2007-04-04 11:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by Teheheman 3 · 2 2

Yes & or:
Bio Chem attack
Bilogical warfare strike
Cyberstrike IE Internet 'crashes' for days.
suicide bombers hit.
All of the above.
Yes parts for nuclear bomb can be in the US Today.
Call in the sleeper cells.
Bam, One Nuke in NYC.
or Wash DC.

Hello Red Dawn, 1980s post atomic war movie.
See RED DAWN.
But the it was still the Cold War with USSR-Russia.

2007-04-04 16:37:07 · answer #5 · answered by STEPHEN R 5 · 1 0

it might rely on the flexibility of transport, this form of burst and the wanted effect. Houston is a reasonably great layed out city, particularly of employing one gadget it might greater smart to apply 3 small one kiloton instruments air bursted at 3 distinctive factors around the city. this might flatten the middle of the city with blast effect and reason fires encircling the city. To smash an underground complicated or make the main of an underground fault, one might set the gadget to create a subsurface detonation. think you go with to break the inhabitants of a coastal city yet bypass away the city incredibly intact? Drop the nuke into the harbor and use the ensuing tidal wave to kill off the inhabitants, beside some flooding the city would be intact. If I remember properly, Houston is located on very flat terrain which permits a nuclear weapons blast effect to shuttle long distances easily. the 1st subject a nuke does is flash; the unexpected launch of thermal capability in a 360 degree circle, almost each little thing in the fireball is going to be vaporized. on the very comparable time you have the launch of Gamma radiation which will irradiate each physique uncovered to it and an out going marvel wave which flatten maximum status systems. Now all of the priority that replaced into vaporized will produces an ash which any survivors will initiate respiratory in very almost on the instant, it truly is Alpha and Beta debris of radiation which will seek for out your bone marrow inflicting to die off in weeks or months following the blast, offering those Gamma rays did no longer toast you while the gadget went off. purely once you think of you need to be risk-free, that out going marvel wave returns coming lower back in the direction of the blast element. the possibilities are that approximately fifty p.c. of the inhabitants would be killed outright by ability of the blast. yet another quarter of the uncovered inhabitants will die interior 2 weeks to 2 months following the attack. yet another 20 p.c. ought to proceed to exist from one to quite a few years following such an attack basically to die from the not on time outcomes of radiation brought on cancers. Of the the rest 5 p.c. some might proceed to exist yet another 20 or 30 years.

2016-11-26 02:42:16 · answer #6 · answered by glauser 4 · 0 0

That is exactly what these kinds of negative thoughts and FEARS attract. You have filled your pants and everyone can see it. Why don`t you just get angry at me? It would be a major step up from the vulnerability that you are feeling.
Then send in another post and we will see what we can do about your anger situation. Ok friend?

2007-04-04 11:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by canron4peace 6 · 0 1

I have seen plenty of comments from Americans on here that USA should 'nuke' this place or 'nuke' that place as a solution to any countries that oppose American policy. You'll have to hope that other countries aren't quite so radical in their thoughts towards USA.

2007-04-04 11:27:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yes. The world is a sad, stupid place, for the most part.

2007-04-04 11:31:06 · answer #9 · answered by Boom 4 · 0 1

I think it is more likely that we will use a device on terrorists, at least I'm hoping.

2007-04-04 11:26:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers