What will you do when Iran is holding your entire country hostage with Nuclear weapons?

Question

Dont get me wrong, its great that the soldiers are going home alive. But I have to ask - what will you do when the Iranians kidnap your soldiers next time? And there will be a next time.


I shutter to think what Iran will do when they go nuclear next year.

Answer 1

Do you mean when they have Nuclear Power Stations .... hmmm I don't know why that should bother us...

And the answer is they won't be holding any countries hostage...we're more likely to be hostages to yoru paranoia than we are to Iran.

Happy to help

Philip

Answer 2

Time and time again we in the west hear about the dangers of Iran having nuclear weapons. There is a couple of problems with this, first they are still at the very early stages of developing them and there is no guarantee that they will get it right.
Second even if they can develop the weapons how are they going to delivery them. There delivery systems (Aircraft, missiles etc) are very primitive by our standard.
Thirdly if they really wanted to get nuclear weapons fast there was plenty going cheap in the former soviet union.
Fourthly I am more worried about Israel, Pakistan and the former soviet union having nuclear weapons.
Remember it was not that long ago that we were all told that Saddam had WMD.

Answer 3

lol the CIA says the iranians wont have nuclear missile capabilities for 10 years where do you get a year from total BS they have even said they want to use it for power why can you not beleive that have you been brainwashed so bad that you just dont get it o'reilly zombie .

we hit Iran its WW3 , the chinese 's oil supply from iran makes up 30% of there usage they have said **** with our supply we fuk with you not in those words but you get the clue , china has mass investment in iran as do they own 80% of americas massive debt . also does russia have mass investment in Iran to attack would be retarded yet will still happen and you will probably be happy about it untill you realise .

this is not about nukes its a sick agender , its about control pushing a total bigbrother police state a new world order and so on , its all a sham like the fake war on terror that started with 9/11 which was an inside job before you start worrying what Iran will do , do a little research on what your own country and government is and will do i have and its not good.

Answer 4

I've read several editorials in the newspapers by want-to-be editors about Britain and not responding with military force to retake their sailors.

These same muck rakers would have written just as poisonous editorials if Britain had marched all the way into the capital of Iran. No matter what the British government would have done, one way or another the papers would have criticised it because they have to sell papers and that's how they do it.

I think the newspapers who ran such stories about Britain not forcing their way into the country is very short sighted and think that the public is too.

Everyone knows that the oil market is very, very tight right now. Any attack on Iran would have caused the price of oil to possibly triple! Then these very papers that are complaining about Britain not doing enough would have been first in line to complain that Britain over reacted. You can't please all of the people all of the time. But with these types, you can't please them no matter what you do.

Answer 5

If the White House goes to a democrat they will meet with little resistance from the U.S. The part most people should be concerned about is not Iran having such technology, per se, but whom will they share it with?

Try this scenario. An atomic blast in a major city of any country followed by a list of demands threatening the loss of another city.

Tinned foods, indeed.


.

Answer 6

Iran can hold the country hostage through oil diplomacy any time they choose. Until I hear and see proof of the Iranian Nuclear proliferation for munitions program from a U.N. inspector--I'll be very skeptical of any theory or rhetorical Warmongering rationale against Iran.

Answer 7

Who says Iran should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons?. The same people who said the Russians and Chinese etc. etc. etc. should not have them. If you intend to go to war, invade and rule the country as your own afterwards as a spoil of war then go for it. If not, then shut the hell up and give us all a break. What makes you think that these people don't already have the weapons. There were enough nukes falling off the back of ex Soviet lorries at the end of the cold war to set up half the world as nuclear powers. Live your life. When it's done, it's done.

Answer 8

To be honest, i dont think Iran has the stones to do anything. They say they let the guys go for easter, thats bollocks we all know muslims dont give 2 shits about other religions, if you aint muslim you are the lowest of the low to them. Iran let them go purely out of fear. The combined strength of the west must be **** scary for everyone in the middle east. America, a country with a **** load of nukes, enough to wipe iran from the face of the globe, Britain, with the most well trained and elite soldiers in the world, I can imagine its scary for them. Britain needs a stronger govenment to say to Iran next time "You are so fucked mate." Blair is a total tosser who was "glad to see them safe" WTF did he do. He didnt do ****. Hes a crap leader who doesnt know what his people want, and his second in command is a fat git who puts money in your right pocket and takes it double out your left. The entire government is corrupt and weak. And what will i do? Sod it i'll join the army. Britain didnt take no crap in the past, why break tradition just because its the 21st century.

Answer 9

The USSR had nukes and didn't use them, because one button pressed means the end of the world. Also even if Iran had nukes now, they would have no way of getting them to a target so i'm quite relaxed, all things considered. This is a victory for "Liberal" diplomacy over hot-headed rush to military action. Have faith, people (even the nutters that run Iran) are much more sane than the west gives them credit for, at least when it comes to self-preservation (I.e. they are not stupid enough to end the world to make a point)

Answer 10

If this country and the world does not wake up we will be facing this terror. Iran's President is nuts. He is proving as his papers report he has foot in mouth disease. And the world wonders when told we have no nuclear weapons just nuclear power supply plants. One inaugurated for off flow I believe this week.
Our US people are in a forced early election season. Nothing is sacred anymore. Not global warming or global peace.