First, people will vote for Democrats. Then they may someday realize that Democrats had no agenda other than they were opposed to anything President Bush said or did. Since they have no true agendas they will rapidly fall into argument and failure. They will then reach concensus that all of this is the fault of George Bush. The press will pick up on this, and blame George Bush for all issues even after he has left office.
2007-04-04 08:50:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Isaac 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
It's really a shame that for the most part any President doesn't see the fruit of his term until after it is over as that is how long it takes for most things to start taking effect in the government. With the exception of war....unfortunately the immediate results via the media is what people focus on...not the potential result.
If people witnessed what happened to folks during WWII think we could have lasted and been as effective? Not to mention the fact that no one was crying over the fact that our nation made a ton of money because all the other country's factorys and ship yards were bombed out! All after FDR's hard work. Who received all the credit for the economic surge then...?
2007-04-04 08:53:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by baby1 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I guess anyone who agrees with what President Bush has been doing !! I get so tired of everything that goes wrong in the world he is blamed for it and i am a military mom whose son is in IRAQ and a lot of people make remarks about how you can't be a republican and support the military too !! Well guess what people i am BOTH!! Besides i know that it is sad to say ,but i am suprised some idiot on here has'nt accused President Bush of being the father of ANNA NICOLE SMITH'S baby!! GROW UP PEOPLE !!! Thanks i feel better now and have a great day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-04 09:01:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by linda bug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Carter and Clinton have not been in office for some time nor run for office and yet some people can not stop fascinating over them.
So about 50 years or until the national debt is cleared up, which ever comes first.
2007-04-04 09:51:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by friendlyflyr 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Question. I think people will still blame President Bush. It will be easy for Hillary to say it was Bush's fault.
2007-04-04 11:01:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tenn Gal 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The president, as it should be. Americans have a duty to question their leadership. Communists, Nazis, and Fascists all have secret police to shut up dissidents. It's nice to have a government where you can whine and complain about everything and not worry about getting shot or imprisoned. When Americans stop being allowed to point the finger at the government when something goes wrong and expect them to fix it, that's when we're in big trouble.
2007-04-04 09:00:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by random 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No One!!!
The Dems will sort out all of GW's mistakes, and any other thing that comes up.
Just like when Clinton was running things.
And all the time thats happening, the neoclowns will go around and invent bs news stories to feed their conservative owned media as a means of re-taking the government, to steal money at any cost of life for their buddies......
2007-04-04 08:52:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Another pricelessly stupid question.
Congress was part of the problem. Now they are not.
A democrat president will accept the cards he's given and fix the country.
So Congress and the president will still both be to blame.
The difference is, they will do something about it.
2007-04-04 12:18:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gerry S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if Bush gets the same treatment as Bill Clinton, he will be blamed for problems for at least eight years after he leaves.
If he is like Reagan, he will get credit for everything others do long after he is gone. It all depends on how strong his spinmeisters are after his term is finished.
2007-04-04 08:52:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by realst1 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well based on the fact that Bill Clinton is still blamed by the conservatives for everything, and he has been out of office for over 7 years, I guess Dubyah is due to be blamed until at least 2015.
2007-04-04 08:50:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋