English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Its typical democrat BS. Her trip will do nothing. If the dems were so concerned with the constitution they should see what she is doing is a direct violation of the constitution. The president mnegociates foreign policy not some dyke from san francisco

P.S. to the idiot abopve me, Saddam was not our enemy when rumsfeld met with him.


Try another Michael Moore retard lie.

2007-04-04 07:58:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 5

I see that you're another victim of MediaHyp. How about trying a little truth from the mouths of our esteemed leaders about this situation during the leadup to WWII;

-----------------------------------------

---------------------------------

These links are to quotes from the Leaders of the World leading up to the current conflict.
Dialogue with Syria has to be started by someone so why not the House Speaker? My problem with Pelosi, is that she doesn't understand the seamy underside of Extremist ISLAM,nor does GWB for that matter. They both, and you should read "The Truth About Muhammad" at

2007-04-04 15:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by Juan H 1 · 1 1

It's a shame the Republican Congress is no longer in control because then they could just pass a law and re-name every foreign leader who they don't like "Hitler."

That, freedom fries and a giant cluster-f in the Middle East is the modern Republican Party's legacy. Great job!

2007-04-04 15:07:36 · answer #3 · answered by Columb H 2 · 4 3

Nancy Pelosi met with a well-known tyrant the instant she walked into a room where George W. Bush was.

2007-04-04 15:00:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 5

NO, It makes me sad that our Imbecile in Chief won't

Then again he speaks with forked tongue
We have released the Iranians we were holdiing to get those Brits back

2007-04-04 15:17:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Yes, and hind-sight is 20/20. Yet we continue with blinders.

2007-04-04 15:13:53 · answer #6 · answered by mbush40 6 · 2 1

When Rumsfeld met with Saddam Hussein in 1983, did that remind you of Chamberlain appeasing Hitler?

P.S. To the idiot below me who can't spell, Saddam wasn't our enemy, but he was a "well known tyrant", which is what was contained in the question.

Try another retarded Bush Administration lie.

2007-04-04 14:58:17 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 4 6

The way the Adm said 'take a number' to Iran when they wanted something aren't you glad someone from the US is going in peace? Regardless of party don't you enjoy life or want to be despised?

2007-04-04 15:01:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Absolutely. And the proof is in the response from leader's of known terrorist organizations. She is the walking embodiment of what they believe all American's to be...a dupe.

2007-04-04 17:10:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I'm just relieved she isn't selling them any chem weapons like the Republicans sold Saddam Hussein under Reagan. You Republicans are such jokers.

2007-04-04 15:04:13 · answer #10 · answered by Gemini 5 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers