For the Right Wingnuts hating on Democrats?

Question

What's wrong with you? You call Obama a terrorist, a socialist, why? So many times you hear how Deomcrats want America to fail and support terrorism and other complete nonsense. Is opposing viewpoints in a free society intimidating? Are you that insecure you have to resort to childish name calling? Go ahead and prove my point, or offer up some FACTS to prove your arguement.

pleased to see well stated valid arguements from supporters of the Rep. party, I agree with most of what you are saying.

I don't consider myself a "liberal" by the way.

Answer 1

I'm a conservative and I don't call Obama a terrorist or a socialist. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with opposing viewpoints in a free society. The problem comes when one side is so convinced of its moral and intellectual superiority that they feel the need to bash those with opposing points of view (and I have news for you -- it happens with equal frequency and equal zeal on both sides of the aisle).

Here's a little constructive criticism for you: You mentioned that conservatives are saying the Democrats support terrorism. That's not true, but it does point out the fact that the liberal plan for dealing with terrorists is fundamentally flawed. See, liberals believe that if the U.S. treats the radical Muslim factions with understanding and offers more and better economic opportunities to Muslims everywhere, terrorism will go away. PROBLEM: Take a look at the four men who flew the planes on 9/11. What did they have in common? (1) They all came from upper-middle-class backgrounds or the Arab elite in their respective countries, (2) They were all college-educated, (3) They were all well-traveled, and (4) They had all spent extended periods of time in the U.S. Now, if you listen to the liberals, you would think that the terrorists that wish to harm us are all disgruntled have-nots who hate the U.S. because we are a land of plenty. Looking at the men who executed the attacks on U.S. soil you see that it really has nothing to do with background, upbringing, or social status. These four men would be considered scholarly in the eyes of American academia, yet they believed that the best thing they could do with their lives was martyr themselves for the cause. This is one area where conservatives are 100% on target -- these enemies cannot be bought, cannot be reasoned with, cannot be bargained with, cannot be talked to, cannot be cried to, cannot be plead with...you get the idea. They are on a mission to kill Americans and they WILL NOT STOP -- EVER. As sad and as troubling as it is to say, there is only one way to deal with an enemy like that. Just remember that WE didn't decide that it's us or them -- THEY DID.

Answer 2

See, we didn't call Obama a terrorist, We called Osama a terrorist. You really need to read it thoroughly before you launch into another hairbrained rant. I we were going to call Obama anything it would probably be Empty Suit.

It's no secret that the Democrats hate President Bush more than they love America because the jackass party goes out of it's way to prove it day after day. Look at the latest from that shining beacon of corruption you call the Senate Majority Leader. Now Dirty Harry is supporting a deadline for troop withdrawl dreamed up by that military genius Russell Feingold. He must have taken that gem right out of the Democratic Handbook. What a brilliant war strategy; "Let's just tell the enemy when we're going to cut & run". I especially like the part where the bill says that we can ONLY take action agains't al-qaeda.

"Hey Sarge, they're shootin' at me."

"Well, don't shoot back unless you can prove that they're al-qaeda or we'll all get court marshalled."

The shortest book in the world; "Successful Democrat Military Stratigists".

Answer 3

The Keystone XL pipeline replaced into projected to create 600 everlasting jobs. no longer tens of millions. 2d it replaced into to hold corrosive Tar oil from Canada for EXPORT to different worldwide places. It replaced into no longer for u . s .. So permit's make this elementary for you: u . s . might carry the environmental hazard, Canada might get the money and different worldwide places might get the oil. Why might the republicans go with this form of deal? What are they getting from it? Is that what you call financial develop? 600 jobs? have you ever seen Lake Ontario recently? you do no longer go with to set foot in it. yet 1983 i replaced into swimming in it. here's slightly historical past lesson. 1973 u . s . had an capability concern and Republican Nixon did no longer something. Republican Ford did no longer something. Democrat Carter had long gas strains to coach u . s . had a concern. Republican Reagan acted as though there replaced into no concern in any respect. i think he in no way offered gas or examine the newspapers, Republican Papa Bush did no longer something. Democrat Clinton did no longer something. Republican toddler Bush suggested drill greater. comparable as you. So u . s . had 39 years to do something and chosen to do no longer something yet get the biggest automobiles made. Now gas is over $3 in step with gallon. properly you had 39 years to be capability self reliant and chosen to do no longer something. final I checked Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Bush have been Republicans. Has it ever befell to you that there is 39 years much less oil obtainable which ability much less to drill? if there replaced into lots oil we does no longer have Tar Sand oil and fracking might we?

Answer 4

All they know is ad-hominem attacks.

You can try to show them how this administrations failed policies have driven this country to the brink. 1/2 trillion spent in iraq. Tens of thousands of wounded and injured soldiers.

Terrorism just as strong as ever as an occupation continues to bring recruits in from all over the world.

And all they can come back with is 'you are a stupid f@gg0t liberal'.

GOP supporters use every logical fallacy in the book, and then pretend to be offended when people don't buy their BS.

It used to be funny, now it's just sad.

Answer 5

Hold everything. I knew the democrats were something else but this takes the cake.

They have just come up with a way to free us from the threat of international terrorism. Define it away!!!

see link

Answer 6

childish name calling.if i remember correctly,is it not dems/lib,doing the name calling,i.e. our president is in competent,our president is a liar,our president is referred to as hitler,our president is a terrorist,need more,just listen to the daily liberal talk shows,i.e. the so called mainstream media.

Answer 7

Name calling is done by both sides of the spectrum.

Answer 8

1 Nothing
2 I did not
3 No it's not, yes they do and no
4 No, you mean like calling them "wingnuts"
5 You mean facts like the ones you just posted?

Answer 9

You must only use 1 ear to listen, because both sides do it.

Answer 10

I won't name names but I get harsh personal attacks to most of my questions just because I don't support our criminal president. Most don't have facts, there is no logic for being a bushbot anymore.