English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They are all recent...

http://alternet.org/waroniraq/49603/......
(An American author is interviewed who explains how there are 130 countries with American military bases in them and the idea of America being imperialistic)

http://alternet.org/workplace/49777/......
(America is trillions in debt)

http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/50085/......
(Russian intelligence leak that America plans to invade Iran on Friday. Says that if not Friday, America still has finalized plans to attack.)

http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/#50118......
(A blog talking about a survey showing that an estimated 655,000 Iraqi civilians died in the summer of '06 alone)

These are all from alternet.org which is an alternative/independent news source. It is not based on republican nor democratic beliefs. All articles are fair to both sides.

2007-04-04 06:01:46 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

Before you answer, please realize I don't buy into them(except the trillions in debt-that's been stated MANY times). I'm not that dense.

2007-04-04 06:35:15 · update #1

4 answers

Since all those links are to total BS I have to say nothing.

2007-04-04 06:16:27 · answer #1 · answered by odinwarrior 2 · 3 0

For a start, it is not independent but has a very decided agenda, an anti-American one.

This author is used to producing anti-American rubbish, why he gets an article on this site. He is not an authority on anything much except anti-American rhetoric. Take anything he say with more than a pinch of salt, about a ton should do.

It says Americans, not America and the figures are disputable.

Do you really believe anything a Russian intelligence leak says? Russian and intelligence doesn't really go together anyway.

A blog!!??? You must be kidding? That figure is one produced from the air and is not verifiable and is for the whole of the war, not one summer. And include those blown up in sectarian strife. Since when have bloggers been a good source of truth? Especially one on a website with an agenda?

2007-04-04 13:28:11 · answer #2 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 3 0

First of all, all of these ramblings are from a left wing liberal propaganda web site. Therefore they have NO credibility what so ever. As for their affect. As long as Americans are gullable enough to believe the bullcrap in those types of articles and fall for their lies, the country will continue to be divided. Divided we fall, united we stand. That is the left wing liberal plan, create division amongst ourselves, by feeding the gullable masses piles of bullcrap meant to work on their emotions so they react irrationally, and know they are so dumb that this will fester causing the division they desire. Its so obvious what is happening, only a complete and total idiot would not see it or deny that its happening.

2007-04-04 13:37:34 · answer #3 · answered by Sane 6 · 3 0

There is no such thing as fair to all sides. All reports and reporters have an agenda. These are actually just stories. All need some kind of confirmation, but all sound at least somewhat plausible. The repercussions for the United States depend on how true these stories are and what is done about these situations.

2007-04-04 13:12:01 · answer #4 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers