Is it the Supreme Court Justice or just any of the justices?
I just took an exam and was wondering if I chose the correct answer.
2007-04-04 05:41:09 · 7 answers · asked by allycat19 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The Chief Justice, if he is in the majority, decides who writes the majority opinion.
Often it is the most senior justice in the majority. Or the Chief may assign someone else, or write it himself.
Concurring and dissenting opinions are written by the justice holding that particular view.
Of course, the justices have law clerks who help them.
2007-04-04 05:44:52 · answer #1 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
All of the justices on the supreme court can, in theory write individual opinions. The voice of the ascenting and descenting opinions is represented
2007-04-04 05:57:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Supreme Court Justices write the opinions and then discuss and vote on them.
2007-04-04 05:50:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Justices write their own opinions. The majority opinion is usually written by the most senior member and any opposing opnions are written by the opposers themselves.
2007-04-04 05:50:17 · answer #4 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gee Wally, A properly regulated militia being needed to the protection of a unfastened state, the wonderful of the folk to maintain and undergo arms shall no longer be infringed. It says that the militia is needed and we prefer an armed inhabitants to achieve this. It does not say that the folk might desire to be in that militia to undergo arms. in fact, it says the wonderful to undergo arms should not be infringed. Forcing them right into a militia is taken into consideration one of those infringement. MTR makes a sturdy element. even nevertheless it replaced into greater effective than luck. The revolution replaced into orchestrated by ability of guys with practise and issues to lose. It replaced into planned and it wasn't approximately classification envy. on the instant, if we had a revolution, it could be chaos. There could be a zillion enthusiasts at bypass purposes working around capturing every physique who has something that they go with.
2016-11-26 01:48:52 · answer #5 · answered by mondesir 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is one of the justices rights for those who agree with him or her, then some justices might concur or dissent.
2007-04-04 05:44:22 · answer #6 · answered by nom de paix 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After next month ///// Pelosi would be my choice
2007-04-04 06:01:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋