English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He is a LOSER! Only a Democrat would run a LOSER for President!

America has already spoken. We don't want him anywhere near the White House!

(And Ann Coulter was right about his sexuality, although she was a bit uncouth)

2007-04-04 05:07:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Haha he is winning in Iowa. Clinton and Obama a scared now.

2007-04-04 05:14:25 · answer #1 · answered by mbush40 6 · 3 0

Ann Coulter has never been right about anything.
John Edwards will not win the primary.
Only a loser would say something like "Only a Democrat would run a loser for President."

W lost the 2000 election.

2007-04-04 05:11:44 · answer #2 · answered by Diggy 5 · 3 2

Nope, he's out. John Kerry isn't working because of the fact he would not desire to, i assume... presently in the race: Barack Obama Hillary Clinton John McCain Mike Huckabee Ron Paul (who has 4 delegates)

2016-10-02 04:13:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I hope he runs he may steal enough votes from the real candidates to help the republican cause. Hey maybe there will be a cabinet position for him in Mitts white house, since he is doing such a good job of helping the republicans..

2007-04-04 05:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by this_takes_awhile 3 · 1 0

He is going to run in the PRIMARY...you do understand how this thing works, right? Seems like before you criticize DEMOCRATS, you should learn how this whole 'government' thing works...

You see, there are a bunch of democrats and republicans alike who would enjoy being our president. But they cant ALL be backed by the party they are in. So, they hold a PRIMARY- To pick which Democrat to support and which Republican to support. He is going to run in the PRIMARY. And I can see from your homophobic remark, you must be a republican.

2007-04-04 05:12:33 · answer #5 · answered by Moops 5 · 0 1

Hey wouldn't you run if someone gave you $30M.

The politicians use champaign $$$ to hire all their friends. Build a big new champaign headquarters in a nice neighborhood. And invest a bundle for liability reasons.

It has nothing to do with America.

Go big Red Go

2007-04-04 05:21:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, BUSH is a loser. And so are the maniacs on the right who have nothing better to do than to question Edwards sexuality.

Edwards is a finer man than most Republicans.

I'd vote for him.

2007-04-04 05:10:48 · answer #7 · answered by brian2412 7 · 4 2

I wish john edwards would run FROM America instead.

2007-04-04 05:39:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He's announced it. I think he should be worrying about his family first. IF he was president and Elizabeth got really ill he could not function as president.

However, if he was still around in November, I wouldn't vote for him because of his views and that fact that he made his millions on the backs of the average American as a trial lawyer - they are scum bags!

2007-04-04 05:15:25 · answer #9 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 1 2

What are you talking about, America obviously Loves a loser! That's why Napolean Dynamite was a box office success, why Will Farrell has a career, and why Bush got elected.

2007-04-04 05:11:11 · answer #10 · answered by Beardog 7 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers