Since President Bush was elected by due process fair and square, we have had to listen to the losers complain ad naseum and just be mukrakers and such bad losers for almost 7 years! Why are democrats so hostil and unable to show some decorum in the public eye. Ironically, I notice that this party seems to attract the same kind of emotional disturbed people it elects. Why such bad sports? Heck, you'd think they'd be all in favor of the election process and repsect the will of the voters?
2007-04-04 04:49:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The republicans are not belly aching about the last election results. We took it like adults. Even the debate here is more sniveling...answers. Let's here some legitimate answers. Like answer the question with an answer not another question d.a.
2007-04-04 05:05:17 · update #1
Simple: Liberals suffer from Peter Pan syndrome -- they refuse to grow up. Instead of accepting the world around them for what it truly is and working within the construct of real life, they DEMAND that the world conform to their point of view. You and I know that the big old world doesn't care about us as individuals, so when they don't get their way they rant and rave and throw temper tantrums. The people who are attracted to liberalism are those who want to be able to do whatever they want, whenever they want, to whomever they want without having to answer to anyone, while at the same time telling everyone else what to do. That's why I could never be a liberal -- I refuse to be an infantile hypocrite.
2007-04-04 05:01:39 · answer #1 · answered by sarge927 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Since you're bitter what are you clinging to? Sounds like antipathy toward others who are not like you. The irony. You used to be a moderate and now you're a liberal. I used to be a liberal and now I am much wiser and conservative. If the Republicans hijacked the country, then why is Congress controlled by the Democrats? You state that the least qualified individuals are the ones making important decisions, but you haven't given any examples. That is typically liberal, so you're doing very well in your new clothes.
2016-05-17 05:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for starters, your very first sentence is what infuriates people who try to stand for the truth. You may want to actually look up the facts instead of relying on Fox news for your "truths". Bush was not elected. He was appointed. That is an indisputable fact. Gore won the popular election and the electoral vote was in question. Ultimately Bush was "appointed" by some questionable tactics. We people who believe in democracy find the notion that someone who seize power through cronyism an offense to the core of our ethos. That, my dear, has nothing to do with partisan, "PMS". You'll find that your over-generalized view will anger many as its a vapid display of the predominant ignorance and lack of the pursuit of truth on the part of the youth culture. Even your title smacks of ignorance. You are a bigot and anyone who is faced with bigoted terms tends to feel attacked. That may be why you find anger. This is just a hunch. The nature of your question is rhetorically insulting. There is no answer for this question since its solely designed to fuel hate. Well done!
2007-04-04 05:05:07 · answer #3 · answered by namedr0ps 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yeah and did you hear any complaints this last election from Reps about false voting, illegal machines, etc. No and all the talks of how Bush would pull things to change the election in 2006 were not seen so maybe it only when they lose they see a problem just like a little spoiled kid. They from early on are the masters of stealing elections look at Chicago for years and even the scope of the Nixon/Kennedy election and the talk of major vote fraud then in many states. Yes even LBJ who I liked was known to have pulled off some funny elections in Texas.
2007-04-04 04:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
It seems the Democrats don't believe in the electoral college and prefer to count individual votes. If the law doesn't fit their specific needs, it is of course an unfair law. The should get off their butts and change the law if it is so wrong, but shut up about of an unfair election they LOST! Get over it!
2007-04-04 05:45:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Judging by the angry tone of the responses, I'd say that the YahooCons need to take a look in the mirror before accusing Liberal Democrats of being pissy.
2007-04-04 05:35:44 · answer #6 · answered by fake_cowboy 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Do not try to understand a liberal or the liberal philosophy. You cannot. They are like children living in a fantasy world,BUT REMEMBER , at the same time they are scary and frightening and mean you no good.
2007-04-04 05:39:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They are like little spoiled children that can't get their way all the time! They'll go to anyone who'll listen to them and like them, case in point - look where Nancy Pelosi is right now - Syria! Wow!
2007-04-04 05:01:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
so sorry, you are wrong.
the most important republican, the president, is in complete denial about the last election and seems 100% bent on completely ignoring the results of the last election.
it's not the dems who are behaving like spoiled children but our president!
2007-04-04 05:38:58 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, the voters spoke out and last year, they spoke out against Bush and the Republicans.
So do as you preach, and respect the "will of the voters".
Why be such a sore loser?
2007-04-04 04:54:40 · answer #10 · answered by Magma H 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋