English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The predictions are out 17 named storms, 50% chance that a big one will hit the east coast of Florida this year. We dodged the bullet last year, 2004 was a nightmare. However, I know you can not predict mother nature. Any ametuers that follow weather patterns and statistics that have their own theory?

2007-04-04 04:31:55 · 9 answers · asked by vivib 6 in Science & Mathematics Weather

9 answers

The season will be more active than normal because there will be no elnino. That being said there is really no way to predict where any hurricane will hit let alone give a percentage. They are only saying 50/50 because if one hits they can say well we were right and if one dosent they can say well we were right.. Florida stiicks out like a sore thumb so they are more at risk than say the georgia coast but there is no gaurentee one will hit the united states let alone florida.

The predictions are for a active season because of la nina ,above normal atlantic basin sea surface temps and weaker than normal trade winds

Seasons with similar conditions as this one include 1950 with 7 hurricanes (before satelites), 12 in 1964, 11 in 1966, 19 in 1995 and 16 in 2003. This also shows the 30 year period of active and non active hurricane periods

2007-04-04 07:06:07 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin B 4 · 1 0

I'm sticking with the good old Quasi-Biennial Oscillation. I know, big name, but it's really quiet simple. All it is are the winds at the 50mb level, or just in the stratosphere. They have a 28 month cycle of easterly flow and then westerly flow. Westerly flow is ideal for hurricane development and easterly flow is not. This generally creates 2 active years and 2 non active years. So 2004 and 2005 were active years, 2006 was not an active year. 2007 will also not be an active year. 2008 and 2009 should both be active years. Unfortunately because it's a 28 month cycle, it doesn't follow the 2 year trend ALL the time. eventually it swaps around and gets a little weird, so there's a little speculation, but it won me quiet a few dinner lasts year (that's what my forecasting buddies and I bet with for weather)

2007-04-04 09:43:17 · answer #2 · answered by weathermanpeter 2 · 0 0

Good question. These are the projections of Dr. William Gray and his team of researchers at Colorado State University. I was fortunate to have done my Ph.D work with Dr. Gray as my principal advisor. These projections are based to a large extent on the temperature of the north Atlantic, which supports 7 more named storms than would climatology suggest. Well the safest guess of course is to go with climatology which is the historical average number of hurricanes or tropical storms or whichever group you want to consider. These stats are available on the National Hurricane Center web page. Scroll down to the climatology link. Climatology predicts ten named storms and 6 Hurricanes two of which will be cat 3 or greater. But I believe that Dr. Gray may be very close this year and I will have to stick with the Colorado State projections.

2007-04-04 06:08:11 · answer #3 · answered by 1ofSelby's 6 · 1 0

you're incorrect on quite some counts. a million- they might have carried out it at the same time as no man or woman grew to grow to be there, merely like quite some way of contractors engaged on residences would do. Their presecence does no longer have aroused suspicion. there have been genuinely weekend skill-downs at the same time as human beings were urged workers were engaged on the wiring. 2- that they had have lined their holes or placed the explosives out of sight of passersby. 3- The wiring should be hidden on the columns or in the different case placed inconspicuously. 4- checks on the metallic complete by technique of skill of Steven Jones operating with quite some universities did detect lines of the chemical elements that make up thermate. you ought to wager you'll no longer detect any strong outcomes one way or the diverse using actual fact the rubble probable grew to grow to be no longer examined in any respect. if so, the position are the negative authorities checks on the rubble? 5- Who says no man or woman detected the fragrance of explosives? there have been all kinds of smells happening alongside with each and each and every and all the confusion, so no genuinely comments on the challenge of the fragrance isn't a strong aspect, enormously because the there are a brilliant style of advice of genuinely explosions. 6- deceptive. what's a "intense record"? some thing that enables your view? a brilliant case for there being some difficulty fishy about 9/11 should be made out of no longer some thing yet mainstream "intense comments." merely check out Paul Thompson's terror timeline, thoroughly taken from the mainstream media. 7- back, no longer each and each and every little bit of files comes from conspiracy internet content. there are a brilliant style of mainstream elements which a wise researcher can practice without the full difficulty about loose change or Alex Jones videos, which now and back do contain inaccuracies..

2016-12-03 06:40:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe it will rain in April and get warm in May JUNE, JULY, AUGUST will be HOT and filled with AM and PM Thunderstorms. The Pacific will be a hot spot for Hurricanes and the Atlantic will have its fair share of Tropical storms and Hurricanes. Sept, Oct, will bring mild weather and Nv, Dec. will see temp fall below 50 degrees in the Northeast.

Have a nice year!

2007-04-04 04:38:05 · answer #5 · answered by Phil H 2 · 1 0

The theory is that no one knows. Last year was supposed to be a major outbreak season and nothing really happened. They can't predict next week so why believe 5 months from now.

2007-04-04 04:36:10 · answer #6 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 0

Actually after watching the weather patterns around the world, i am now a huge of Mother Man.

2007-04-04 04:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

we're still getting over Charley from 2004. I hope they're wrong.

2007-04-04 04:41:11 · answer #8 · answered by wendy_da_goodlil_witch 7 · 0 0

They have never been right w/ their predictions, so its pretty meaningless.

2007-04-04 04:35:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers