Yes i agree. I think it would be funtastic to see hannity and oreilly walk hand in hand down the street outside the greenzone, unescorted and by themsleves shopping.
I would pay to see thatno camera following them either. just hidden camera so we can see the looks on their faces.
2007-04-04 00:36:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eyota Xin 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
They have been there repeatedly, Hannity, O'Reilly, Rivera and North have all been there. Rivera and North have actually gone in with combat groups. The fact is that they will show the problems and the successes both. Tell me the last time CBS or NBC showed the new schools, the hospitals, the soccer games, or anything else that might be viewed as successful?
Fox repeatedly complains about the progress of the war but at least shows the fact that 85% of Iraq is now safer than Washington DC. Does CBS bother to tell you that if we pull out of Iraq right now, a lot of the insurgents will simply move their fight with us to Afghanistan? How often has CBS or NBC showed you clips of Al Jazerra TV in the middle east calling for the total destruction of Israel and the United States. Never that I have seen.
2007-04-04 00:47:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You think the media wants to show any positives? It would defeat the cause of your libs wanting us to lose this war. start some emailing to soldiers over there and they will tell about schools being re-opened, factories up and running, etc. The Iraqii people have been pinned down for so long that it will be ahwile before they adjust to their freedom! Nothing is "peachy" there right now but positive strides ARE happening!
2007-04-04 01:58:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
UM they do, I have seen plenty of fox news coverage in Iraq. When they talk about the liberal media they are covering a very large subject. Not just how good it is in Iraq. They give the truth to us and we decide our opinion. The other news sources give us there opinion and tell us what to think.
2007-04-04 00:31:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Actually, it IS Fox News that has reporters imbedded with the military and walking the streets of Iraq. CNN tried to get someone over there, but all their reporters would only report from their Five Star Hotels.
2007-04-04 00:54:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Terrie 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wow some of these Conservative answers say its safer in Iraq than in Washington D.C. Lets bring the troops home and invade Washington D.C. I'm sure the president will have a plan.
2007-04-04 01:34:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by David R 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think Fox leans towards the republican side and they might have to be careful because of the incident with Geraldo Rivera in Irag...I loved it!! No one seems to like him but you gotta give him credit for having the balls to go over there with his own crew to tell it as he saw it. It's just a opinion.
2007-04-04 00:32:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by chatticathi52 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They do. For that matter, I see Fox News Channel reporters broadcasting for every hotspot in the entire world. Greg Palkott was just broadcasting from one of the most dangerous areas in Afghanistan. Maybe you have to actually WATCH the channel before you start making these stupid accusations about it
2007-04-04 00:34:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
they can't, because iraq is not a good place.
mccain had 100 soildiers and various planes circling over head. the market he was at was bombed the day after he left
2007-04-04 00:53:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
oh common it is safe...didn't you see John McCain walking around on the streets? I mean he was wearing a flak jacket and was surrounded by tons of troops....but it's obviously safe enough for him! Just because a bus full of explosives kills 100 kids every other day doesn't make it a bad place.
2007-04-04 00:55:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Franklin 7
·
0⤊
1⤋