MSNBC. they have a fairly balanced staff
2007-04-04 00:55:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
None of them.
Considering how the Mainstream media coverage were practically cheering the Democrat Congressional wins in 2006, just as they were dejected when the Republicans won Congress in 1994, there is little basis to claim they have no bias.
The Fox coverage of 2006 did not show any of the jubilation of the other "news" stations, nor did they exhibit any of the dejection that was apparent in 1994. They reported it as it happened, without showing any bias.
2007-04-04 08:30:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I usually flip back and forth... I find that Russert & Brokaw (he'll be back, covering election night) provide the best coverage. I'll probably check CNN sometimes, since they have many screens to track all the races at the same time.
2007-04-04 07:16:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by amg503 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nickelodeon!!
2007-04-04 07:22:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by littledel 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no such thing as unbiased news coverage.
2007-04-04 07:11:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cybeq 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Fox will still be the most unbiast to watch.
2007-04-04 07:39:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
and I'd bet you think Dan Rather is the best reporter.
2007-04-04 07:13:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Quickie D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree. BBC
2007-04-04 07:12:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eyota Xin 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
lol all of them
2007-04-04 07:11:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Linda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
BBC
2007-04-04 07:11:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cash 3
·
0⤊
1⤋