English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

for driving under the influence, in 1976, at the age of 30.

2007-04-03 22:53:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush

2007-04-03 22:54:19 · update #1

12 answers

With all the criteria you listed, I suppose that's so. Question is; SO WHAT?

2007-04-03 23:59:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i'm a Democrat and what others ought to call a "Liberal". yet i don't believe of that Mr. Bush turned right into a poor president. convinced, I suggested that. huge kind one, an interview with Condoleeza Rice and having seen him function in man or woman in Texas (lengthy earlier he became even Governor) enable me comprehend he became no longer a racist. As for Iraq, which to me is his greatest failing, i became furious about the full count until eventually I had a communicate with one in each and every of my strong acquaintances in Israel. He instructed me that Bush became probable arising yet another the front for the war on terror, one which would keep the terrorists remote from usa. Given the mission after 9/11 this may were a authentic reason. i'm certain that each and each and everybody the individuals bent on jihad who descended en masse to Iraq ought to have concentrated usa if no longer provided that little "distraction". i'm nevertheless harm that many human beings paid with their lives, that it took away attempt and time in Afghanistan, and it value and remains costing hella money. I also took comprehend the particular incontrovertible fact that Cheney and many different such men made distinctive earnings the full company, yet there are consistently war profiteers. i'm also a student of heritage. ALL PRESIDENTS make mistakes. some own, some political.. some do both. Bush isn't the first man or woman to artwork jointly in a expensive war. As for the commercial device, properly, even nonetheless both President Bush and President Obama both get killed for it, it became construction for a at the same time as. a blend of being in a expensive war, plus undesirable company practicies, plus a lack of yank authentic economic superiority (which has been construction on the grounds that we propped up different countries after international war II) contributed to the crumple, very almost, of the commercial device. i do not blame G.W. for global warming and its appropriate climate themes both. He did strong issues and undesirable issues. Obama is doing a similar.

2016-12-03 06:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That's unlikely. Clinton, Bush, and Bush the first were all pretty much just good ol' boys in their youth, and they probably got in their share of trouble. Reagan was a B-actor in Hollywood for years, so ya know he had some stuff goin' on occasionally. Jimmy Carter may have had some scuffles, just pure speculation, but he was raised in the back woods areas of Georgia by his ma and step-father. And you can't tell me that with all the corruption in the Kennedy that John F. Kennedy always kept his nose clean. Bottom line, this concept of digging that far back into the past to attempt to paint a picture of the future will only hurt us ultimately. I'm not a fan of Bush, but why would spice up the pot like that? If he's bad enough bring up current sh*t not out-dated nit-picky crap.

2007-04-03 23:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0 0

If any one of them had prior convicted felonies, they wouldn't have been eligible to run for the presidency. As for misdemeanor arrests, I don't believe so. Unless there were laws against drunks riding horses, such as in the many cases of US Grant. As for the rest, I'm sure it's just that they didn't get caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

2007-04-03 23:13:17 · answer #4 · answered by gone 6 · 1 1

Is B. Clinton the only President that could have prevented a war, but was too busy with self-gratification?

2007-04-03 23:53:37 · answer #5 · answered by Cheryl 5 · 1 2

I know that Grant was once arrested for speeding on a horse.

2007-04-03 23:39:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Ask Ted Kennedy. He keeps stats on drunkenness and unaccountability.

2007-04-03 23:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by George 3 · 1 2

wow...31 years ago...seems like yesterday....another liberal grasping at straws...lets talk about a president that SHOULD have been placed under arrest...Well put the Clinton"legacy" just under your question here and see which one looks more stark...sorry liberal, you lose on this one..

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-04-03 23:19:30 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 3

If he can still become president of USA..it OK...Why you want all of us to remember this incident. Lets talk IRAQ and BUSH.

2007-04-03 23:13:59 · answer #9 · answered by KISH 2 · 0 2

I don't know.... but your Mom just got picked up on 3 counts of solicitation last night.

2007-04-03 23:00:12 · answer #10 · answered by dr_methanegasman 3 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers