In thermodynamics, there are four laws of the interactions of systems pertaining to the balance of energy and matter transfer. These laws basically follow the outline of classical physics, as mostly relates to heat and proposed interactions of the 4 known forces: Strong, Weak, EM & Gravity. However regarding theories of gravity even Einstein was not satisfied with his explantions and really never embraced quantum mechanics becuase of the anomalies but there are some new ideas in plasma physics that seem to bring some attention to areas of cosmology that may be wrong, which have a trickle down effect thoughout the other sciences, perhaps you could begin here and have a look for yourself>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&q=thunderbolts+of+the+gods&hl=en
2007-04-03 23:12:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perpetual motion has been a dream for at least hundreds of years. Many thousands of people have proposed schemes to accomplish it, and so far, they have all been wrong. This perfect record led people to call it a law, a law of thermodynamics.
If you do find an exception, the rewards are great, starting with a Nobel Prize in physics. If you know anything more about this research, I'll help you check it out. The odds are against it.
2007-04-04 15:06:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's a quote by Albert Einstein:
"A theory is the more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises is, the more different kinds of things it relates, and more extended is its areas of applicability. Therefore, the deep impression, which classical thermodynamics made upon me. It is the only physical theory of universal content concerning which I am convinced that, within the framework of applicability of its concepts, it will never be overthrown."
In other words, the laws of thermodynamics are here to stay. If we can say anything with certainty in science, we can say that. Anyone claiming otherwise should be taken with extreme skepticism.
2007-04-04 05:48:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes that is actually possible,but in some special and limited cases only,let me display an example for u to prove this theory,let us consider to masses of stones of both 5 kg,the first stone is a complete mass and the second is disintegrated into small rocks or pabbles,but both stones r of the same weight as we said before,now if we bring these 2 stones and throw the first stone which is the complete one into a lake it will wake large water circles around it,now if we bring the second stone which is also the same weight but disintegrated into small rocks,and also throw them into the lake water but in consecutive circular motion simultanuasly,it will leave also water circles around them but in larger area then the first stone,thus genarating larger amount of energy then the first stone.goodluck in understanding all that.
2007-04-04 06:09:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there have been many theorys about how to break the 3rd law of thermodynamics most dealing with electro magnets but to this day none have been fully functional so until the device is tested extensivly it is a safer bet to presume it to be another failed attempt
2007-04-04 05:34:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by oblivious 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
impossible
2007-04-04 05:37:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dilip Dey 2
·
0⤊
0⤋