Would we be a bit smarter if billions were spent on Education rather than War?

Question

Wishful thinking because the people would be to clever to join a Military and hasten their deaths....

Answer 1

Human beings are a pitiful lot. I'm almost sad to say that I'm one of them.

The folly of war is almost like a curse that won't go away. Through the ages, it shifts and changes but always, there is some nation or group of people wanting to fight for their cause or push their beliefs upon others. The result is war.

It's always been this way and I suspect it always will be this way. Mankind will continue on fighting petty wars until the technology gets to the point that the real psychos will be able to do great harm.

Believe me, that day is coming. Someone will do some genetic engineering to a virus or bacteria and release it or discover some energy source that will allow for the easy creation of powerful bombs. They will do these things just to kill other human beings.

Man predates upon man and I believe gets exactly what he deserves. Afterall, that's just the way we are...

Answer 2

If wars were in any way related to intelligence then why haven't smart people figured out how to stop them? If billions were spent on education instead of war then people would get smart enough to figure out where the best place to got to war is. War is an issue of morality. Two peoples having a difference of beliefs so great that blood is spilled. And I'm not just talking about religion. I'm talking about right and wrong. The only way education can make everyone believe the same the thing is to brainwash everyone. And who brainwashes the brainwashers?

Answer 3

We already spend Billions on education and we see they lousy results. Over the years since Pres. Johnson's "Great Society" we have spent Trillions!! Taking money from the war effort or anywhere else will not change things. We should have figured out by now that just throwing more money at most problems is not a solutions

Answer 4

at the same time as maximum individuals imagine of nationwide protection they imagine of our protection rigidity features. Tanks, planes, plane distributors, wise bombs, et cetera. If our Commander-in-chief asks for and receives a announcement of war from Congress because the country faces a danger that won't be able to be negotiated away, then we've a tendency no longer to 2d wager him/them. We also have a tendency to help throwing overwhelming firepower on the issue proper now as a fashion to soften up the enemy for the inevitable on the floor invasion and keep American lives. we prefer to apply those trillions invested in bombs and missiles to defeat the enemy and keep lives. Spending billions on practise or, for some, basically having a federal branch of teaching, is reason for challenge if no longer secession. the actual incontrovertible fact that the President has a constitutional duty for nationwide protection, yet no such short for practise, is a partial clarification for his or her derangement. yet practise is likewise seen as a community difficulty and, for this reason, any attempt to advance or expand it a liberal plot to substantiate all little ones have equivalent get admission to to a great practise which will provide them the abilities to prevail in a global economic device and experience a gratifying existence. the actual incontrovertible fact that our perfect nationwide protection is a multi-layered and increasing American economic device that entwines the globe and brings relative prosperity international huge, and that such an economic device calls for fantastically knowledgeable and imaginitive persons, does resound with persons if you're making the argument for practise a nationwide protection argument. in the different case, spending billions on practise that couldn't pay a global dividend for 20-25 years is a difficult promote. we choose a good protection rigidity, yet it is not any longer adequate for a good nationwide protection. For that we choose the international's perfect economic device, and for that we choose the right knowledgeable and imaginitive human beings in the international. None of it takes position by technique of magic. you're making it take position with time and funds and a mission to that you commit your self. Take care.

Answer 5

I don't know if we'd be any smarter, but I'd like to see billions of dollars of taxpayer money spent on something that would actually benefit the taxpayers. I'd prefer that it be spent on making affordable, good quality health care easily available to all US citizens.

Answer 6

My thoughts exactly cept Id put 100 million into scholorships 50 million on police departments 15 million on police services in africa 35 million on government grants and loans (non existant) 800 million on health care services in U.S.A

Answer 7

I am all for education, but when there is world crisis, it must be nipped in the bud. Perhaps instead of throwing money into global warming research, we could be better serviced by funding education.

Answer 8

The republicans feel that if we were smarter, then we would figure out what they were doing and hold Bush, Chaney, and the Oil Cartels accountable, thus ruining their chances of world dominance, and complete genocide and/or discreditation of the Islamic faith, to which all catholics, baptist, jewish and mormons that voted for this retard wants.

Answer 9

Who is "we"? All of humanity, or a particular government? Probably be smartest of all to let each person spend their own money the way they want. For myself, I wouldn't spend money on education or war.

Answer 10

Too much money is spent on indoctrinating young children to the liberal religioin.