The so-called "Islamic" republic of Iran is seeking from Mr. Kerry a series of concessions that would allow them to become a nuclear weapons power and circumvent the restrictions of the USA Patriot act to infiltrate intelligence agents and potential terrorists into the United States.
How could Mr. Kerry and Mr. Edwards, who claim to be able to defend America better than President Bush, allow themselves to fall into such a trap? Top Kerry and Edwards advisers warned both candidates against accepting campaign donations from people with close ties to mullahs in Tehran months ago, sources inside their respective campaigns say. And yet, neither Mr. Kerry nor Mr. Edwards has done anything to distance himself from these donors. On the contrary, both have continued to take their money and promote their agenda.
Mr. Kerry adopted a key element of that agenda in last week's presidential debate. If president, he said he would have "offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel
2007-04-03 18:57:04 · 14 answers · asked by Inquisitive 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeaah-----you are right-----remember how China dumped millions to get bill c. re-elected-----he turned right around and bestowed them with "Most Favored Trade" status-----(despite the fact china uses forced slave labor)-------and now look at nearly everything you drag home from the stores (non-perishables)-------made in china
2007-04-03 19:07:11 · answer #1 · answered by EZMZ 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
"Nukular" weapons power or help Iran develope nuclear power? Circumvent which restrictions? Restrictions on smuggling terrorists into the country? Kerry was going to help Iran smuggle terrorists into the United States. Your going to accuse John Kerry, the decorated war hero of the Vietnam War, whose shoes you would be dwarfed in, whose courage and honor, the likes of George W. " A.W.O.L." Bush or his entourage will never fathom, you're going to accuse this man of complicity in a plot to smuggle terrorists into the country he volunteered to fight for. And you're going to slander this man without any references, now, after all this time. Your motives stink on ice, whatever they are!
2007-04-03 19:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton paid Iran and North Korea not make nuclear weapons in the 90's. They thought they could trick Bush into doing the same thing. When he wouldn't go along with there demands for money, they increased their efforts to make a Bomb. North Korea has already succeeded. Iran is not far behind.
2007-04-03 19:09:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
specific they are unlawful. remote places nationals and remote places companies are prohibited from contributing to political campaigns. Democrats have been getting around this by ability of coordinating wealthy remote places donors with 527 agencies who can fund political advertisements as long as they do no longer advise or coordinate with any political candidate. clearly they smash this rule all of the time. by using fact the marketing campaign finance bill replaced into exceeded in 2001 Democrats have had extensive reward in marketing campaign investment. however the preferrred courtroom recently ruled that any enterprise has the wonderful to fund political advertisements for despite they go with to assist. advertisements funded by ability of remote places people and companies are nonetheless excluded. yet any American citizen or group of people can positioned their money jointly to recommend for the flesh presser or reason of their decision. it truly is precisely a unfastened speech subject. each physique tries to spin it the way they go with. yet I commonly come down on the fringe of freedom. i do no longer think of every physique might desire to be silenced.
2016-11-26 00:58:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well , now that you`ve made me a penny wiser with this info,I guess it is about time such democrats start openng their eyes a little wider and help Bush and his admin in coping with Iraq and Iran.that way at least they will gain some knowledge and experience and if elected(god forbid) not make blunders.
2007-04-03 19:08:36 · answer #5 · answered by Spoorthy M 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If true, probably not near Saudi Arabias Contributions to Bushs.
2007-04-03 19:17:33 · answer #6 · answered by EAT! 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Huh... Is that anything like the Bin Laden family contributing to Bush family campaigns?
Maybe I'm just confused...
2007-04-03 19:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by Frank 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Does anybody remember that Halliburton has contracts with IRAN RIGHT NOW! and they also get no bid contracts through the BUSH ADMIN due to Cheney?
Their stock has gone up 400 percent since cheney took office.
Stop being a 2 faced coward and read between the lines!
2007-04-03 19:03:49 · answer #8 · answered by jim c 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Proof or source please. I remember hearing the talking trees form "The Wizard Of OZ" gave Kerry money too, but he is a relative so I give more credence to this story.
2007-04-03 19:06:42 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How dare you work for the terrorists?
Reagan supplied Iran with arms to fund a counter insurgency military operation not authorized by the AMERICAN people, you traitor.
IRAN-CONTRA. So help me God, Ronald Reagan can be PROVED to have armed IRAN>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2007-04-03 19:08:26 · answer #10 · answered by Truth 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
WAIT A SECOND IS KERRY RUNNING FOR ANYTHING....WHY DOES THIS EVEN APPEAR IN POLITICS IT BELONGS IN HISTORY..........AHHHHH WELL WHEN YOUR GRASPING AT STRAWS WHO KNOWS WHERE YOULL END UP
2007-04-03 19:14:10 · answer #11 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋