English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The 1993 film Dazed and Confused is a high school story set in 1976. Later in the movie one of the characters explains her 'every other decade theory'. Being a 70's character she says that the 70's sucked and maybe the 80's will be cool. Since the 60's were "awesome" and the 50's were bland, this is her theory.
Do other people see this as being true. Is each decade just a rebellion against the decade before? Are there similarities between the 60's, 80's and 2000's and between the 50's, 70's, and 90's?

2007-04-03 17:39:28 · 2 answers · asked by Ryan B 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

2 answers

I think the 60s are overrated by aging hippies who are nostalgic... the 50s definitely had better music, between rockabilly, r n b, doo wop and rock n roll, whereas in the early 60s things started to lilt until the beatles came and brought some life, then went the way of the druggies. The 80s were a good reaction the listless 70s, but the 90s were probably better (at least for those of us who liked to dance). So I don't think it works.

2007-04-03 17:44:52 · answer #1 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 0 0

while scientist makes a hypothesis it may desire to be conceivable to purpose or degree whether it incredibly is physically powerful. in the event that they only made issues as much as fulfill their equations that had no connection to actuality they could lose their jobs. each and every each and every now and then scientist speculate approximately Parallel universes etc. yet it incredibly is not an element of any respected theory. Gods and different supernatural beings at the instant are not testable and subsequently it may't be an element of any scientific theory. the enormous bang on the different hand has been examined many situations and not one of the information conflicts with the assumption, this does of path no longer mean it incredibly is an absolute actuality even though it incredibly is astronomically unbelievable that it incredibly is punctiliously fake. in case you are able to desire to have faith in a god why can´t the enormous bang have been the tactic god used to create the universe? until you interpret the bible actually technological awareness isn't incompatible including your worldwide view, you consume shellfish suitable?

2016-12-08 17:49:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers