They do not have a responsibility for anything. They are a business and they are not to blame for over eaters and those who are over weight. It's the fault of the eater and no one else. There is too much of a possibility that it could be something ELSE. Eating at Mcdonalds is NOT the only way a person can gain wait, thus, they are not legally responsible. One would need substantial PROOF that they are the primary reason and there is nothing else. This is an impossibility.
2007-04-03 16:04:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ariel♥ish♥ness♥ 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
At wendy's there is the baked potato that's between the healthiest ingredients ever made in rapid nutrition as long as you get no toppings and condiments on it. At McDonald's, the only nutrition that's healthful is the salads. even however the pies and end result are additionally no longer too undesirable for you. Burger King only have been given the Apple Fries, and that they are in actuality only decrease up apples made to be a healthful dessert for little ones and wellbeing concious human beings.
2016-10-20 23:18:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ramayo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they dont - People should take more responsibility for their own actions. Everybody knows that if you live off mcdonalds you are going to unhealthy and obese.
Why should a company take responsibility because some people dont look after themselves. I like a mcdonalds as much as the next person but I dont live off it. It doesnt do any harm in moderation.
I get sick of this blame game - people blame fast food companies for making them fat, but no one was forcing them to buy this food. They could have easily gone to their local supermarket and bought healthy food.
2007-04-04 22:00:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady Claire - Hates Bigotry 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If they can make their food healthier, sure why not. But overall it's the public's responsibility to eat healthy. If people don't like it then they aren't being forced to purchase food from mcdonalds.
2007-04-03 15:48:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rawrrrr 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think McDonalds has the responsibility of informing its customers what they're consuming if they decide to purchase their food. However, like you and others, I think that people make the decision to buy McDonalds. Although economic situations do play a part...
May God bless you.
2007-04-03 15:50:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Heck no, people (myself included) should be free to choose what they want to eat and when they want to eat it.
This is a major failing of the legal system, too many frivolous lawsuits are filed these days. If someone's first reflex is to sue a restaurant for their / son's not being able to keep their cake hole shut, there's a serious problem. Things like that shouldn't even get to the judge.
But yeah. I'd gladly trade 20 years off my life for being happier and more in charge of my choices.
'Nuff said.
2007-04-03 16:49:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No. People are responsible for what they eat and where they choose to eat.
If creating healthier food increases business then it would be a good thing for McDonald's but they should not have to.
2007-04-03 15:49:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Karrose 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think they should be allowed to serve whatever they want and prepare it however the want, regardless of how healthy is it. People make the choice to eat there, perfectly aware of what they are about to eat and how unhealthy it is.
2007-04-03 18:00:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jaim Jaim 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
if they can make the same fries they make with bad fats, with good fats like safflower oil then why not? no one will stop buying food cuz they make it healthier
they use haelthier ingredients in other countries that force them to
2007-04-03 19:35:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They're free to feed you poison as long as you understand what you're paying for. So no.
2007-04-03 15:49:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by someon 3
·
1⤊
0⤋