Cheney's house is falling down, and there's no one who can stop it.
His lies, his frightening hatred for the truth, his alarming methodology in keeping America's children in harm's way, when he was too much of a COWARD to do his duty during Vietnam, all these things are leading to his downfall.
Cheney is the worst sort of human; selfish, hypocritical, and blind to his own insanity.
God will judge him accordingly.
2007-04-03 15:48:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Truth 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Cheney had Iraq in his cross hairs and there was no way he was going to let that go and if that meant lying to the American people then he would do it as a "means to an end". LBJ did the same exact thing with the Vietnam war, Gulf of Tonkin incident. His lies were worse than even Bush's because Cheney actually knew that he was lying Bush just said what he was told to say. Either way, both of them, were 100% wrong & they are going to have to live with the blood of over 3,000 US troops on their hands.
2007-04-03 15:52:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Similar yes. Could also point out name of an intelligence agency in U.S.A. has initials which stand for Nazi in German. Natzionalist Socialist . Add Agency and you get N.S.A. Slur it a bit and it even comes close. Surprising no one had noticed similiarity. Also look at National Security Act. Would think any nationalistic thinking would have been shied away from after WW2. Would have thought more care in selection would be made in names. Act was passed in 1980's under Reagan administration if information correct. The Natzionlist Socialist Agency spies for The U.S.A. Wonder why no one upset guess it doesn't mean anything to them. Nazi stands for Nazionalist Socialist . It was Hitler's Party. Best to keep in mind Human Supremacist Attitudes reject them as racist. Educate against. Make illegall.
2016-05-17 03:05:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by brook 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Far as I can see, Bush has never KNOWINGLY lied to either the Congress or the American people. He sincerely believed what he was saying to be the truth. Considering that quite a few Democratic party leaders were saying the same things about Saddam and Iraq, who was really lying?
2007-04-03 16:14:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
if u look at mr bush u can see that he of the entire administration is not a good leader.. i mean seriously.. just look at his conduct.. id say that he was merely like a rubber stamp on all matters and now he's the lame duck sitting and getting all the blame. but i say that if it were any other resident who was sitting in his position then, he would have probably done the same thing by invading iraq. bush i think would have tried to fight against going to war with his buddies(if u \ve read michael moores books youd see he had more to lose than win by going to war).. so yea
2007-04-03 15:53:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If he lied, so did Tony Blair, M7, Aleander Putin, Cherac, the entire united nations and 17 resolutions prior to the invasion.
PS Chlorine gas was recently used by insurgents, were did it come from?
2007-04-03 15:47:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by 79vette 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Peterhead Eisner lied to steal your money...All "Liberal Spin "and you bought it hook, line, sinker, pole and reel, too!!
That's why you always spend your money on that trash. You want to believe there was always some "big cover up" or such nonsense and you will pay money for anyone who tells you what you want to hear.
2007-04-03 15:58:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by mark k 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Propaganda is used as a tool to make the public believe what the author it wants them to believe. So yes in that respect I guess it does.
2007-04-03 15:53:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
name one "leader" who does not lie.
no one needs to read a book to know how bush and cheney lied...i think you wasted good money.
2007-04-03 15:51:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by lostourcountry 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
So you already read the book?
2007-04-03 15:45:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋