Facts against cloning for debate?

Question

I have a debate tomorrow and i need counter-arguements, facts for against cloning.

Answer 1

If you have a herd of cows or crop that are exactly the same then a disease that kills one will kill them all.

What if cloning was a piece of cake. What then? You could make thousands of perfect soldiers, scientists, politicians, laborers, etc. in just the right quantity. You could develop a perfect society. Everybody in their place. Born into their profession. No need to change or improve. Have perfect citizens obedient to their masters. No conflicts, no rebels, no change. It would probably be the end of the human race.

Answer 2

Interesting...

You're going to get lots of hysterial "its immoral
and opens a can of worms" and not much beyond
that ... people just don't want to think about the
implications.

I'm not saying there aren't problems, but people
shun the discussion.

Lets see...

1: Artificially tampers with the gene pool - humans
are already no longer selecting (evolutionarily) against
bad eye sight, so more and more people require
glasses, etc. Imagine if we start cloning people/tissue
that couldn't ordinarily reproduce. We will create a
species that is entirely unable to reproduce without
a medical infrastructure. We will be selecting FOR
people who have enough money to clone. Perhaps
not the best physical characteristics to be using as
a guideline for who progresses through evolution.

2: Umm ... encourages immoral behavior that isn't
cloning but is at least a factor to people's horror:
People might do bad things with the clones. That is,
a clone might not be given the full and loving tender
care that a more traditional child would have.

To me, thats an ENTIRELY different issue. Child
neglect, or even homicide/fetuside are different than
the issue of cloning - but most people don't make
that differentiation.

3: The technology will definitely cause a barrage
of other technologies that are legitimately scary,
eventually leading to scientists tinking around on
the gene-by-gene level. That doesn't require cloning
for experimentation, but it surely does make it easier,
especially if you want to do controlled experience.

Note that NONE of the above arguments is any sort
of religious gut instinct against God's intention, etc.

Can't speak for the big man. Unlike everyone else,
he isn't that specific when he talks to me.

Answer 3

Cloning has a very low success rate. For every successful clone that is born, hundreds more died either as an embryo or as a fetus. Even after birth, most clones have health problems, and if they are lucky enough to live past infancy, they will face accelerated aging and an early death. This could be considered unnecessary suffering for whatever end cloning is meant to achieve.

Answer 4

key in a search for cloning at www.fotf.org, which is Focus on the Family's Website. and that should get you lots of facts against cloning people or organs for sale, from placental stem cells.

Answer 5

Against Cloning Facts

Answer 6

the wonderful thank you again up with information is do study on the subject. attempt and hit upon a technological know-how paper on cloning so it truly is going to likely be impartial. Get your information from there. sturdy luck!