2007-04-03 15:22:30 · 10 answers · asked by P51DFltLn 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Rowling has never specified which one was born first- sorry!
2007-04-03 15:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by Saria 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Weasley Twin
2016-12-12 12:21:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think that fred is the oldest twin. My reasoning behind this is Fred's name comes first whenever they talk about them and besides his name comes first in alphabetical order. You see they aren't often referred to as George and Fred. Usually whoever's name comes first is the oldest.
2007-04-03 22:11:58 · answer #3 · answered by Gemma. 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
im not 4 sure?? good question....4 all those people who say it doesnt really matter about the fact that they r twins, U ARE S0o0o0o 0WRONG!! there were twins that were born 2 months apart!! YEAh!! look it up...really interesting by the way!!
2007-04-03 15:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Blue 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
George? But then again They are twins so there would not be too much difference between Their 'ages', would there?
2007-04-03 15:29:38 · answer #5 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
they never said in the books but that's a really good question though hope u find out the answer
2007-04-03 19:21:44 · answer #6 · answered by jeangray26 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very good question. i would like to know that myself.
2007-04-03 15:28:18 · answer #7 · answered by Vi 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well fred was born first.its mentioned in one of the book i forgot.
they were born 2 months apart.
i am an ardent fan of hp and am eagerly waiting for dh,are'nt u.
2007-04-03 16:51:43 · answer #8 · answered by Ashley. 3 · 2⤊ 7⤋
why don't you ask mrs. rowling?
2007-04-03 16:06:53 · answer #9 · answered by Meena 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
who cares
2007-04-03 15:29:59 · answer #10 · answered by July 24, 2012 <3 4 · 1⤊ 11⤋