First off, he stood zero chance against Umaga, he didn't even put up a fight. And secondly, he didn't even stand a chance against Snitsky. Snitsky beat him like he had zero wrestling skill.
Balls Mahoney is really better than that, right?
2007-04-03 12:50:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
YEAP HE WAS BETTER!!! WWE IS JUSS BIENG DUMB!! WHEN I MET HIM ALL THE FANS WERE TELLING MAHONEY TO BRING BACK THE OLD ECW!! LOL BUT THEN HE SAID THAT IT WASENT UP TO HIM!! =] HES A AWSOME GUY!! LOL HE DREW A HEART ON MY FACE!! =]
2007-04-03 12:56:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course Balls Mahoney is better. WWE figures that since he weighs 305 pounds they should take a strong guy like Snitsky or Umaga and throw him around like he's nothing. He wasn't amazing in the original ECW, but at least he had wins and was able to show off his skills.
2007-04-03 20:16:53 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When ecw was Extreme not this watered down version balls mahoney was Ecw . Yes Balls Mahoney is better than that.
2007-04-03 19:57:51 · answer #3 · answered by Wrestle Man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he is.
but because he's not 6'10" and roided to the gills, he's not looked at as much to Vince and his endless parade of yes-men. so don't expect Balls to be around for long. mark my words.
2007-04-03 20:03:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its the New ECW Extreemly crappy wrestling !
The old ecw EXtreem championship wretstling was way better idk what the **** they are doing with balls looseing all the time!
2007-04-03 19:56:49 · answer #5 · answered by Undertaker12345678#2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋