Prior to the 2006 elections he claimed the Demotraitors would not try to de fund our brave troops. Now the little weasel has changed his tune.
The terrorist must just smile when this poor excuse for a man opens his mouth.
2007-04-03 12:50:36 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chatnoir....bite me
2007-04-03 12:57:49 · update #1
I see the Harry Reid apologists like Andy R have come out of their spider holes to respond.
2007-04-03 12:58:56 · update #2
I will pay ChatNoirs one way ticket to Canada if she leaves this week.
2007-04-03 13:10:16 · update #3
Give Reid a LARGE under the table donation and he will vote the way you want
past track record to prove it http://www.latimes.com/media/acrobat/2003-06/8306315.pdf
2007-04-03 13:24:25 · answer #1 · answered by noethics 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not the first time.
A little while ago when Sen. Carl Levin and Sen. Joe Biden drafted a proposal for immediate withdrawal, Harry Reid showed his true colors by supporting the proposal and giving the senators his blessing. He later commented that this was only the first in the democrats' efforts to force the administration to pull the troops. Seems defunding was apparently already an option being discussed at the time.
2007-04-03 13:01:12 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
on condition that whilst is the issue to hand all approximately classic pork on a invoice? Your argument leaves little regard for our troops that's actually disheartening. the days of Bush getting all of his Legislative desires without an inkling of descent are over. the individuals voted to get the governance they needed and the Dems are giving it. Bush's investment desires are ALL met in this invoice. If he does not like it, then he certainly won't like the subsequent suggestion which cuts off investment for conflict all at the same time. Bush is soliciting for yet another sparkling verify--with none plan, benchmark realizations, or any stated aims from the Maliki government--WTF stable is that? How might desire to you even evaluate being in choose of this variety of request thinking we would desire to continuously not additionally be there interior the 1st place?
2016-11-07 03:53:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dirty Harry is firing blanks which is good. What's even better is that dirty Harry is driving a deep wedge into his party, and he is forcing Hillary to take a stand that will splinter her tribe and cause them to leave her village for a more sane and consistant leadership plank.
Fortunately for republicans there are no democratic presidential hopefuls that fit the bill, including her. I can't believe how weak the dems are right now.
However, I can't believe how early this race is starting, it's rediculous, and it's hurting our troops.
2007-04-03 13:01:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The terrorists are smiling because they see us splitting our country over the politics and not the cause. The civilized and western world has one common enemy, known as radical Islam (Islamic-fascists) and until we can set aside our differences on political issues like Christianity--Bad and George Bush--Bad! The true enemies which are plotting and planning their next attack will soak it all up and use it to their advantage!
2007-04-03 13:03:55 · answer #5 · answered by Geo Washington 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats are giving Bush all the money he asked for. Bush claims that he will veto the funding legislation because he doesn’t like the deadlines. I think Reid is right. If Bush wants to veto the funding then he gets nothing and the war is over.
2007-04-03 12:56:42 · answer #6 · answered by relevant inquiry 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Doing the same thing over and over again to get the same results is the definition of insanity. A normal person uses their judgement to determine the best step to take if the current situation is not working.
2007-04-03 12:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Republicans have gutted support for the troops in the US military for Haliburtons sake. Bush the Decider hire hitmen from companies like BlackWater Security, a for-profit Red State mercenary labor force whose training was paid by Bill Clinton's Dept of Defence.
2007-04-03 12:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I wouldn't confuse your sentiments with even the most conservative republicans. But you do have that Heil George goose step upside logic that is most befitting of the Neo-Con minority red-neck brigade soon to be out of office along with the terrorized blood and guts senseless war machine insecure faithless scared of the dark bigots.
2007-04-03 12:56:16 · answer #9 · answered by andy r 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Here's an idea.. shut up with the political rhetoric!! seriously!!
Left, Right, Conservative, Liberal.. ALL IDIOTS!
That does include you.. Mr. Righty.. or shall I call you Mr. Conservative? either way.. IDIOT..
not only that but you are ignorant and should be ashamed that people like yourself, and the other American people that you hate, are tearing this country apart.. so much so that I'd almost rather live in Canada! so SHUT UP!!
2007-04-03 12:55:34 · answer #10 · answered by Fluffington Cuddlebutts 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋