The choices are:
1) Ralph Nader
2) Barack Obama
3) Ted Kennedy
Choose one.
2007-04-03 11:18:39 · 20 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would choose Barack Obama because at least he is honest and does his part to make a difference in the world. I would not choose Ralph Nader because he has little politican experience and Ted Kennedy is way too liberal.
2007-04-03 11:21:18 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Barack Obama
2007-04-03 11:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree that our election equipment has some basically inherent flaws yet Iowans aren't any more figuring out on our president. Iowa is the positioning of the initial caucus and they are not electing our president. the purpose is for determining the applicants and the candidate that win Iowa and New Hampshire get a advance to their campaign that gives you them an early lead yet even this does no longer assure some thing. in case you keep in mind in 2000 John McCain received those early primaries yet nonetheless lost the Republican nomination to Bush. So briefly, you're misinformed my pal.
2016-10-17 22:59:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama. Look at his websites I list below and you will see why he is important. He is an environmentalist. He talks and speaks like he is one of us, not a POLITICIAN, he has a good view on how to change the health care system, he wants to see all Americans be provided with a good education, also vows to take good care of our Veterans, from the past as well as after the war and now. He is fighting for a clean government, not led by corruption. Check out the websites listed below and make your decision.
obama.senate.gov
BarackObama.com
2007-04-07 05:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If these are my only three choices, then this would explain why there is less than 30% turnout rate at elections. Rather than choosing the lesser of two or three evils, Americans choose to stay home and not vote at all.
2007-04-03 11:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of the 3 communists that you have listed, Ted Kennedy is the least communist.
I would pick Teddy even though he drowns young girls.
He is probably less evil than the other two.
2007-04-03 11:23:55 · answer #6 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Obama, because he is more likely to invite smokin hot celebs like Beyonce and Cierra to state dinners.
Nader would just pick at his food and worry about pesticides, and Kennedy would roll into a corner and do his amazing impression of Jaba The Hutt
2007-04-03 11:22:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ralph Nader.
2007-04-03 11:30:04 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
My bet is Rudy Giuliani . Hands down. Tried and tested during the 911 crisis.
2007-04-03 11:26:10 · answer #9 · answered by ★Spotter★ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obama
2007-04-03 11:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋