English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Paraphrasing "W" by 2017 we will cut emissions by cutting dependance on oil by 20% by substituting alternate energy but we must maintain economic growth to enable reaseach in that field. Don't you love politcal rhetoric? However, he also said, the problem is with China because they will contribute more pollution and off-set our cutting down on emissions. Yet we contribute to the pollution produced by China by buying their exports! When is the last time you bought anything that wasn't made in China!!!? We are contributors to their pollution while at the same time we're not encouraging our own industry or retailers to buy American or come up with a policy to encourage more competition in this country to produce quality merchandise that won't result in pollution or compete with China? It is like a dog chasing it's tail. If he catches it, he bites himself in the a88. Answer this cunudrum and win a Pulitzer prize. At very least, you will realize Bush hasn't a global clue.

2007-04-03 11:15:28 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Evil Vid got it so far, any other non-lemmings out there? The question is clear. Never mind, I'll spell it out. Is Bush blowing smoke?

2007-04-03 11:26:39 · update #1

I guess nobody appreciates the philosophical impact of the premise.

2007-04-03 11:29:43 · update #2

8 answers

I've made that same exact point before...this administration criticizes efforts to curb our own emissions by pointing out that China and other undeveloped countries should have to do the same...while ignoring the fact that almost everything these countries produce is for the American consumer.

2007-04-03 11:21:38 · answer #1 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 1 0

In until eventually now centuries, there have been land hundreds that linked considerable continents. throughout the organic cycles of warming and cooling, those land hundreds disappeared. If there had no longer been organic worldwide warming interior the previous, the earth might nonetheless be interior the throes of the ice age. guy replaced into no longer around to effect this organic warming. So why does every physique think of that guy is the clarification for any worldwide warming? Algore's "worldwide warming" has been no longer something yet a hoax, and the emails recently hacked divulge their lies. The emails divulge their efforts to fudge the numbers while the final 10 years confirmed a cooling cycle. those emails additionally uncovered their efforts and decision to silence any opposing perspectives of maximum excellent scientists. The UN jumped on board in an attempt to income capability and administration over the international economy (exceedingly that of the USA of a). Algore purely did it for the money and an allusion of capability. As for living on an island it is sinking -- style of a dumb place to stay interior the 1st place (like New Orleans, that geared up a city interior a fishbowl). the two shore it up, or flow. (evaluate the islands recently geared up by ability of the United Arab Immirants. in the event that they are able to construct an island interior the midst of a sea, certainly people who stay purely extremely above sea point ought to initiate construction concrete partitions or something)

2016-11-26 00:07:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Design products that last. Then there won't be an issue.
When was the last time a china (note: not chinese) product lasted beyond a couple of years.

2007-04-03 11:38:00 · answer #3 · answered by Wonka 5 · 1 0

China and India use so many crappy cars and have so many factories that they create more green house gases than anyone else. The other big cause of global warming is cows farting.

2007-04-03 11:20:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

oh puhlease..and on the other hand you support the pelosi/reid regimes call to get rid of oil company energy exploration credit to remove dependence on foriegn oil and give that money to farm aid through title one that produces significantly higher corn and milk solids pricing....wow...i bet your a real charmer at the dnc get togethers arent you. classic case of textbook hypocricy.

2007-04-03 11:19:33 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 1

Come back when you have a question.

2007-04-03 11:23:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Is there a question?

2007-04-03 11:19:12 · answer #7 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 0 1

is he blaming it all on the chinese??

2007-04-03 11:26:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers