I do not believe one could time travel because I do not think that every second that passes is forever frozen in the part of the multidimensional frame of the space time continuum that it existed in. Besides if time is set and there is ways of traveling to and from different times then you would be as much a part of it as it is of the tangible world and you would be affected by any movements in time, so you could only move within the frame of your own bodies lifespan.
Now even if it were possible to accelerate to sub light/or light speed and this did effect the ways you experienced time changing around you. It would not matter because while you may have experienced a millennium worth of time and seen all the galaxy and met god when you returned to earth the amount of time that went by would not have been affected by the speed you had achieved or the length of time you felt and only you would have seen that amount of time.
Though in real facts you could not stand the gravitational acceleration, but if in space with no nearby planet or star with any gravity this would not be a problem.
2007-04-03 11:49:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Dude Abides 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Earth, and the entire Solar system are moving in space at an incredibly fast speed. If you move 1 hour into the future, without allowing for the displacement in position, you will end up in the vacuum of space, because the Earth will have moved on. This is why time travel is also not possible. Very few people, when they talk about time travel, allow for the physical displacement, and naively assume that the Earth is just going to sit around waiting for them to reappear.
Please don't state things from science fiction stories like Hyper Dimensions, echo waves and multi-universes, as if they exist - they do not.
.
2007-04-03 11:51:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Labsci 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only FACTS about time travel that human's have ever observed are these:
#1: Time dialation as described by General Relativity has been observed. This has been done multiple times by setting two identicle clocks to the same time and putting one on a highly accelerated object (such as the Concorde or Space Shuttle). Eventually, the clocks that should have maintained the exact same time will get off by fractions of a second.
#2: Scientists have used particle accelerators to speed up elemental objects with known half lifes to some of the highest speeds man has ever produced (though fractions of the speed of light). After doing so, we have found that the half life of these objects CHANGES by fractions from the constant we know to be for that element. The inference of this is that due to the acceleration (and again consistent with General Relativity), the element experienced time differently while accelerated than we did while observing that acceleration.
Those are THE ONLY facts about time travel we know. Anything else you have to say or have ever heard is pure hypothesis, and though some theories are more likely than others, they are non-the-less no more proven than me saying I can stop time by sticking a two pound live chicken down up my @zz at midnight on the day of the winter solstice (which, by the way, is the true secret to time travel..and works better with a little KY jelly).
2007-04-03 11:46:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by TopherM 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm-m, sounds like a big, big leap from smeared butter to time travel to me. I can see your table full of smeared butter, but I cannot see your method of achieving time travel. The theories you express are fragmented and not based upon any research or developments in technology that I am aware of. Naturally I am not "all knowing." However, I looked carefully at your proposition and could not find one item within it suggesting that you had any technical data to offer the general public on research you had performed, and things which you discovered/developed to make time travel a reality.
Acceleration of any man made device, or organism, much beyond 50,000 miles Per Hour has thus far proved beyond our technology.
In the case of complex organisms such as human beings there is the huge problem of "G Forces" encountered in huge accelerations from Zero MPH to, say, Earth's Escape Velocity. The G's encountered in just that are enormous. You certainly do not suggest that man is capable of withstanding 1000 to 3000 times those forces?Your test pilot will become a jiggly pulp of mush if you push the Launch button under those circumstances.
Regards,
Zah
2007-04-03 11:36:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by zahbudar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Firstly, what you say about not being able to exist in the same time and same place twice is flawed, there is no evidence to support that fact, because no one has ever traveled back in time - you are taking what you have heard in movies and from books there, pure fiction.
There is a theory about wrld-lines lately, where one can travel back in time, presumably to change an event, like the grand father paradox, but if you do kill your own grand father, you would not necessarily cease to exist or what not, because you would then be creating an alternate world, in which you live in the time where you have just killed your grand father, but the world-line where you are originally from is still existing, the only differece is that you are not there (because you traveled back),
Think of it like parallel worlds, the same principles apply.
2007-04-03 16:08:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lief Tanner 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are 2 considerable theories, or faculties of concept in philosophy of time. i've got responded incredibly some stuff on time interior the previous, typing great long issues, yet i'm definitely too drained marvelous now, so basically some little comments. there's a-concept and B-concept (terminology first got here from McTaggart's universal paper, The Unreality of Time). A-concept is a dynamical view of time, that posits a shifting "now" it is continually changing and progressing into the destiny. one thank you to photograph a common A-concept photograph of time, is think of you're on a deliver in the dark, because it drives parallel to the coastline. because it truly is shifting it truly is shining a spotlight on the properties that line the shore. basically one house is illuminated by ability of the spotlight at a time, and despite is lit up is the present. The "now" is specific and distinctive from the previous and the destiny. Time "flows" in certainty. The previous is now no longer real, and the destiny isn't yet real. basically the present. B-concept of time is a static view, retaining that there's no ontological difference between the previous, contemporary, and destiny. style of like what you have been announcing related to the destiny being especially lots the precise comparable by using fact the previous. you could photograph the universe as a significant four-dimensional block, referred to as a "block universe". All activities interior the universe, are laid out and unchanging. it truly is all purely set into the block, as though it have been set in stone. (of direction confusion commonly is offered in while picturing this, so understand that no it is easy to certainly view the universe like this. by using fact your attitude might might desire to be outdoors of the block, which ability you're outdoors of time!)there's no metaphysical difference between the previous contemporary and destiny, as A-concept holds. Any difference is purely illusional by using way our minds journey the international. so which you and your ecosystem frozen in time 2 seconds in the past, from the you and your ecosystem at this contemporary 2d is ontologically the comparable. The previous isn't any much less real than the present, neither is the destiny any much less real. there's no concrete purpose "now", basically observer based ones.
2016-11-26 00:05:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by mijarez 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your hyperdimensional travel on echo waves seems like it came from a sci-fi book or a comic book. There are no such things.
2007-04-03 11:10:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gene 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wrong ! Were Traveling through time right now, Now tell me were not.
2007-04-03 11:23:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by ThomasL 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
your way of time travel cant be right.
2007-04-03 11:12:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by blah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I could find my portable Flux Capacitor, I could show you...
2007-04-03 11:15:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋