DEMOCRATS: Why Don't They Man-Up and Serve?

Question

Liberals only represent 7% of the military according to the ultra-Liberal "Military Times". Why are only Republican kids fighting this war while you lazy, do-nothing, cowardly, armchair subversives sit on Yahoo all day like a bunch of losers?

Get in the game.

Answer 1

Why don't you get in the game, chickenhawk?

I never was for this war, never will be. If there was a war out there worth fighting, one not sold to us via propaganda and fear-mongering, I'd sign up in a heartbeat. People w/ an IQ over 60 see what this war is truly about, therefore, that explains why many liberals haven't signed up.

Answer 2

Kim I don't know about the statistics that you quoted but it is logical that the Armed Forces will claim to be more on the side of those who preach war and that is the conservative republicans. You have quite a string of words there!! I remember that when I was in the service party affiliation was the last thing on my mind. I don't doubt that the same goes today. As to getting in the game, have you gotten in the game or are you a"lazy, do nothing, cowardly, armchair subversive who sits on yahoo all day like a bunch of losers?"

Answer 3

Because liberals just want to b*tch about the poor, the uneducated, the misinformed, the underprivileged, and those without any other means in life who HAVE to fight the war. They just don't really mean it when they proclaim that the burden of fighting this "unjust war" falls on this unfortunate class of people and what really should be done is to have the RICH and the REPUBLICAN kids fight so we they will learn just how wrong war is. Everyone else fights but them. Remember, to liberals, words are always much better than actual deed!

It's then so pathetic how liberals see our brave soldiers as losers when the come home.

Answer 4

Hey there Kimmy, why don't you quit playing your games. You're not part of some greater Zionist movement. You're wasting time, American lives and tax dollars!

Bush and company have not made America safer, they have created hundreds of thousands of new enemies.

This war isn't about 9/11 and the war on terror anymore. Its a war to get rich. Halliburton and the no bid contracts should be enough to convince everyone. Especially now that they have made all that money and are moving to Saudi Arabia where 3/4 of the hijackers came from.

It's all about foreign interests and has 0 to do with America or our Security!

How anyone can feel safer by occupying Islamic nations is a joke! How anyone could still support Bush and his madness is insane!

Answer 5

Like Bush and Cheney did during Vietnam? Right you are, LMAO. Hon, I did serve my country, right after the Vietnam War. I was a Democrat then, but became an Independent shortly thereafter. Why haven't Bush's daughters "manned up?" Too rich, too spoiled, or just too precious? It used to be that the children of politicans were the first to enlist in a war. See, those Presidents never even considered asking citizens to fight in a war that their own family wasn't contributing to in the same way. But now Bush's nephew has enlisted, is that correct? Good on him, it's about time someone with the namesake of Bush got in the trenches.

Answer 6

I'm in an entirely different game, and you can't switch at halftime. I don't care who wrote that, to say that only 7% of the military is liberal/democrat is a flat out lie. Unless a good part of that 93% are those who enlisted, like Mr.Bush, but did relativley nothing, except not report for duty, throw parties, and fly a desk instead of a fighter jet. Get your facts straight- the republicans are the ones avoiding the military and claiming to be patriots.

Answer 7

I usually only respond to people after I read their previous questions to determine if they deserve to be taken seriously.

In this case, I won't bother with a useful response, but based on the attitude represented in your questions, may I safely assume that every male friend or relative that you could possibly consider a "man" is current or retired military? That, of course, must include any sons or brothers or cousins or nephews you have or plan to have, of which I assume that you will openly ridicule them and mock their manhood unless they serve in the military, regardless of political beliefs.

So why are you on Yahoo all day like a bunch of losers instead of serving?

Answer 8

Only as long as I can take Bill Loofah O'Rielly, Flush Limpballs and Karl Turd Blossom Rove along for the ride!

You Republican dirtbags are just mad that there is a large public forum called Yahoo Answers where an American can tell the rest of America what is going on.

You tried to put an end to it by using your Zionist muscles to shut down the Yahoo message boards. You succeeded but never considered the fight would shift to Yahoo Answer boards. You wish you could keep every American in the dark, but the light shines through because of people like me and millions of others who are now awake.

Take your little GOP paid Answer trolls and go do something positive for your side, like fighting in your false war.

This is nothing more than a theater to make elite power holders richer so they can fund their little families in politics for years to come. War is money! It worked for Bush's Granddaddy "Prescott Bush" when he moved and laundered money around for the Nazi regime and its working again now with little George Jr.! With so much money flying around who can track it all. Truckloads/Millions have come up missing since Bush started his little wars.

Answer 9

They consider the Bush initiative to be an illegal war with its agenda based in economic gain instead of american priciples of government and due process. The average american did not sign a contract like a soldier does when they go through recruitment and indoctrination. And we still have the 1st amendment which allows us to shoot our disagreeing mouths, whenever (except in cases in that it would be considered inciting sedition).

Did you serve? or are you just being an armchair political critic?

Answer 10

Burris is merely yet another corrupt Chicago baby-kisser. on the grounds that Blago became attempting to promote the appointment there is not any reason to have self assurance that Burris did not purchase it. everybody from Chicago who has extremely said politics objectively will allow you to comprehend that Roland Burris is not any diverse from Balgo or Richie Daley.