Maggie & Parker had affair and fell in love. Each was in bad long term marriage w/ 2 kids. They live 150 miles apart. Each agreed to leave their spouses, begin divorce & then Parker would move in with Maggie & kids in her town within 2-3 months. They would live there for 1-2 yrs then move to Parker's town so he could be near his kids. Marriage was implied & was important since Maggie had custody of her kids. Maggie left her spouse immed. & was divorced in 5 months. Parker left his wife but stayed in his town, chose not to move in with Maggie until aft. divorced. Maggie waited15 months for him to get divorced. Finally he said he'd move in with her but he feared she wouldn't be able to move back with him because the ex would stop her in court. He said that since he wasn't sure she could move, he would NOT marry or commit to her until she lived in his hometown. What do you think? Is this right? How could Maggie drag her kids 3 hrs to his town when he didn't commit or marry her?
2007-04-03
08:33:54
·
6 answers
·
asked by
batscout
2
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
Parker's reason for not getting a divorce sooner was that he didn't want to ruffle his wife's feathers so that he could have maximum access to his kids. However, he ended up giving wife sole custody with every other weekend visitation. Maggie is the custodian of her kids but Parker only has every other weekend visitation rights. Nevertheless he is a loving father and close to his kids. He feels that if he commits to or marries Maggie he will be betraying his kids or telling them that he will never move back.
2007-04-03
14:16:12 ·
update #1