Reggie Bush, hes just a bad @$$
2007-04-03 08:46:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by jared o 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
There's no question! I'll take Reggie Bush over Frank Gore any day because Gore can't break the 60 yard run for a TD, but Bush on the other hand has the ability to score any time he touches the ball. Whether its catching the ball or running, and Gore can't catch the ball nearly as well as Reggie Bush.
2007-04-03 08:50:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by #1 BALLER!!!!! 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
well frank gore is the stronger running back reggie bush is the faster running back.Frank Gore will carry his team while reggie bush has a all around good team. I think that frank gore is going to be the better running back, Who knows maybe he might be able to break 2000 yards this next season.
2007-04-03 12:11:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by wallymar 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Reggie Bush
2007-04-03 10:32:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by pete999 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if your talking about strictly running back then take Gore because if your talking about a complete football player he doesn't compare to Reggie. Yeah Gore can run behind a sucky line and break tackles and make more yards but Reggie split time with Deuce, as a Wide out as a Wingback as a Slot as the primary HB. Reggie is way more athletic, and it'll show in time. Gore is good now, but he takes way too many hits, thats why he fumbles so much, Reggie is elusive enough he doesn't take half as many big hits, and thats the difference between fumbles and not, and thats the difference between being on IR for a season and playing healthy.
2007-04-03 09:03:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
thus far frank gore has proven he can carry the load of an offense. reggie bush had a decent rookie season but still has a lot to learn and was only splitting carries. frank gore would be the correct pick now but that may change down the road, because reggie bush has amazing potential.
2007-04-03 08:48:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chuck Briggs 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gore. Gore can, and has, carry the load for a team with 25-35 carries a game for a season. He is also a decent receiver. Bush had a good year last year but with splitting the load with McAllister. Bush a better receiver but I don't think Bush could be an every down, 16 game RB and make it through an entire year.
2007-04-03 09:33:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Frank Gore will have a better year again (assuming no injuries) because he is the main back on his team. Bush is an amazing talent, but he'll be splitting carries again next year and getting a lot of his yards in the recieving game. That being said, I think New Orleans will have a better year than San Fran because the two backsystem seems to be the system of winners now in the NFL.
2007-04-03 09:10:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by DoReidos 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Right now, frank gore but later. Reggie bush
2007-04-03 09:28:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well right now I would take Gore because he proved that someone could run behind a not so good offensive line. The 49ers OL is not that great. Down the road I might say Bush; but right now I would take Gore because he led the NFC in rushing yards this past year, and Bush split time with Deuce McAllister.
2007-04-03 08:42:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Robert L 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I want to say Frank Gore, he is a great running back but he fumbles practically game so i'll have to say Reggie Bush because he's a great reciever and running back.
2007-04-03 08:44:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by gekkman34 2
·
1⤊
0⤋