I feel that she does not have the knowledge, the know how or the strenght to be a Commander / Chief. To her this is all about the celebrity and she is out-of-line to be running. She thinks she should be president of our nation, cause she can raise money. Where is she coming from, with no foundation to her campaign and changing the person she is to the person she is talking to. Why the hell are we doing this?
2007-04-03 08:24:58 · 18 answers · asked by LindaAnn 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Do not answer talking about Bush.
2007-04-03 08:49:05 · update #1
No. You are correct, with her as it is for most liberals, its all about the power, control, and the money. They could care less about the people, but the gullable keep voting for them like they do. Stoops.
2007-04-03 08:32:27 · answer #1 · answered by Sane 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I see where you are coming from about her being out of line for running as a moral question. But it is a free country and if we are stupid enough to elect her as a country then we deserve her. After the economy tanks early in the 2nd year of her reign and our taxes go up 40-50% and "free health care" is shown to be the nightmare that it is I wonder if the Bush haters will forget about him and turn on her? Probably not they will still blame Bush. lol Remember the ones who like her are the young who in school were taught that Bill Clinton was the greatest president of modern times and Abraham Lincoln only deserves a brief paragraph. Regan was an idiot and Jimmy Carter was a great foreign policy president. lol Even though Bush through his tax cuts let our economy flourish during a time of war and natural catastrophes,made it so unemployment was at records lows and the stockmarket at record highs he is the worst president we've ever had. It just proves that lies told and retold and retold always find their way to be the truth to the ones who don't do their own research.. The libs are bulldogs on their quest for power I give them that. And since the republicans are scared of them they just may win the white house. Just scares the hell out of me not just for me but for my children and thier children.
2007-04-03 09:02:04 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
At this point I don't give a damn if anyone is qualified to be the leader of the western world. I just want a leader of the USA. What does it mean to lead the western world when the country that is supposedly leading the western world doesn't have a leader who cares about his/her own country?
2007-04-03 08:31:46 · answer #3 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i do think she is qualified to be leader of the western world. you're talking like she has no experience when she has been a political force most her career.
i do think she is too polarizing of a person to make an effective leader. too many people hate her and it seems for personal reasons i don't understand.
you feel she does not have the knowledge or know how or strength? she's stronger than Bill and she was an integral part of a successful two term presidency, so what makes you say that?
2007-04-03 08:32:10 · answer #4 · answered by Diggy 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
At this point in the 2000 campaign, I could have taken everything you said and said it about George W. Bush. And there is a difference: Hillary has worked in the federal government. Texas has, constitutionally speaking, the weakest Governor's office in the country. He was less prepared to be President than any major-party nominee since Wendell Willkie in 1940. Compared to Bush, Jimmy Carter was prepared. And he at least got a peace treaty. Bush couldn't even READ a peace treaty, much less desire to get one.
2007-04-03 08:29:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Compared to who? What qualifications did George Bush have in 2000?
She's a US senator in her second term. She has every right to run. Who are you to say she is out of line? If you don't like her then vote for and support her opponent.
2007-04-03 08:31:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You mean you don't think it's enough to be Hillary Clinton? What do you expect? An actual campaign platform?
2007-04-03 08:29:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'm in the western hemisphere, and she sure as hell won't rule my world!
2007-04-03 08:35:30 · answer #8 · answered by Mighty C 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your question is odd... she is as qualified as any other politician... she has been a lawyer all her life and has been a Senator for the past 6 years... you may not like her politics, fair enough, but she is qualified...
2007-04-03 08:32:55 · answer #9 · answered by aspicco 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm not a big Hillary fan, but could she possibly be any worse than Bush?
2007-04-03 08:32:17 · answer #10 · answered by Guy Inginito 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I agree entirley with your opinion. She is not qualified to be the first female president. And the fact that Bill is her husband just makes me think less of her.
2007-04-03 08:33:05 · answer #11 · answered by purple_morning_gloree 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋