There is overwhelming evidence that Bush and his klan have committed numerous crimes against humanity and is undoubtedly guilty of numerous impeachable acts. Why doesn't the House of Reps, the only government entity capable of impeachment, do something about this rogue administation?
2007-04-03 06:19:43 · 30 answers · asked by Jonathon M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Think about it. First, the claims are questionable, which means that it would be a long, drawn out battle to get the votes in the House for an impeachment. Then it would be a long drawn out battle in the Senate to try to remove him from office. It couldn't possibly be done before the next election.
2007-04-03 06:23:47 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
When did you study constitutional law and from what school. Guess what get over yourself, there is no evidence of any treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors which is the only way the constitution says a president can be impeached. So unless you put real facts on the table then no there will not be an impeachment since the Dems have no facts either on this. Its easy for a few of the far out dems in Congress to throw this around but House leadership knows there are no reason to impeach anyone or they would of done it by now and it has nothing to do but timing. Now when you get your facts from celebrated brainiacts like Bill Mahrer, Jon Stewart, Michael Moore maybe you think there are grounds for impeachment but the last time I checked their degree from kindergarden does not count as a law degree.
2007-04-03 13:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"There is overwhelming evidence that Bush and his klan have committed numerous crimes against humanity and is undoubtedly guilty of numerous impeachable acts"
I would love for you to cite this overwhelming evidence and these numerous impeachable acts, just one. The problem is you can't because they don't exist. Get over this impeachment talk it's not going to happen.
2007-04-03 13:31:03 · answer #3 · answered by ReedRothchild 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For the 19283737647483993034046th time - NO CRIMES OF ANY TYPE HAVE BEEN COMMITTED.
Your opinion, fueled by your hatred of President Bush, does NOT suffice as "proof."
And just where is all this "overwhelming evidence" of which you and all the other Bush-haters speak?
Has any state court indicted him? No.
Has any Federal court indicted him? No.
Has ANY court ANYWHERE indicted him on ANYTHING? No.
Once again, logic and the FACTS prove you and all others like you to be wrong.
Besides, don't you think that if he had in fact committed an impeachable offense, the Demoncrats would already have been all over it like a pack of drooling mongrel dogs on a bone?
2007-04-03 14:08:02 · answer #4 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Here's four quick reasons that I can think of:
First, what you call "Crimes against humanity" is only your opinion, and it's not shared by everyone. Impeachment requires the violation of a US law, not an offense against your sensitive nature.
Second, there is not the political support in the House at this point to support it. Politicians are sensitive to which way the wind of popular opinion blows, and it's not blowing in that direction at this moment.
Third, there's only about 18 months left before the election. Democrats would rather wait and let Bush serve as a bad example, so that they can say, "Our guy has to do better than that", rather than be the cause of a political uproar and furor.
Fourth, if they do impeach Bush, and oust him, they'll have Dick Cheney as president. If there's anyone that they hate worse, it's Cheney. Or maybe Carl Rove.
2007-04-03 13:27:30 · answer #5 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Impeaching the President of the United States is no longer something that is done because its deserved it is done as a political ploy by the opposing party from the President. Unlike the Republicans did with Clinton the Democrats know that while they may be able to pass articles of Impeachment they do not have the votes in the Senate to convict and remove so they are going to do the smart thing and just not start the process.
2007-04-03 13:26:46 · answer #6 · answered by scho2677 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because they are not as smart as you. They can't come up with any crimes against humanity. They haven't found any impeachable acts or crimes Bush committed. Maybe you can bundle up all the evidence you have and send it to them. I am sure they would appreciate the help
2007-04-03 13:35:44 · answer #7 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Lol, because tehy don't have any evidence of him commiting even 1 impeachable offense. And an article from infowars.com does not fly when it comes to making the commander-in-chief stand down in a time of war.
If they had anything they wouldhave nailed him to a walla long time ago. They have nothing.
2007-04-03 13:42:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The overwhelming evidence would be easilly forgotten if Bush and company were impeached and removed from office. But allowing the corruption to continue and result in our monthly scandal plays better for the Democrats. At election time all this can be listed and who supported the Admin. Over and over people will be reminded of the corruption, the lies, the incompetence, arrogance and greed of Bush and his minions.
Democratic victory like 1964 when Lyndon Johnson won by a landslide over Barry Goldwater and ushered more Democrats into seats in both houses of Congress. Very possible.
2007-04-03 13:25:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
For the millionth time, you can't impeach him without a crime. Just because you hate him doesn't give you any grounds. If it did work that way, you and your ilk would have already been put in your grave.
2007-04-03 14:07:32 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋