BRANES are objects in M-theory and its offshoot, BRANE COSMOLOGY.
In M-theory, p-branes (the name is derived from membrane) are objects of spatial dimensionality p (for example, a string is a 1-brane).
In brane cosmology, the term "brane" is used to refer to objects similar to our four-dimensional universe, which move in a higher-dimensional "bulk".
The central idea is that our visible, four-dimensional universe is entirely restricted to a brane inside a higher-dimensional space, called the bulk.
The additional dimensions may be taken to be compact, in which case the observed universe contains the extra dimensions, and then no reference to the bulk is appropriate in this context.
In the bulk model, other branes may be moving through this bulk.
Interactions with the bulk, and possibly with other branes, can influence our brane and thus introduce effects not seen in more standard cosmological models
2007-04-03 05:35:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rod Mac 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi troll, in some vast experience, "evolution" does clarify cosmology. interior the 1st seconds of the great Bang, the Universe became fairly heat, very dense, and extremely, very mushy. Early inflation (under no circumstances properly understood) smoothed out lots of the preliminary density irregularities, leaving basically some "seeds". via fact the Universe elevated and cooled over billions of years (an stated fact), those seeds superior, by way of gravitational instability, into small galaxies. Stars shaped interior of them, with the help of gravitational instability of the gas---the celebrities created the climate, in basically the staggering abundances. famous person and planet platforms are "evolutionary", with the countless early lumps in a protostellar nebula soaking up others, and the whole device evolving right into a stable complete, with a famous person interior the midsection and planets that no longer collide with one yet another. The small galaxies "ate" one yet another, with the main important surviving till the present time.
2016-12-15 14:57:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't try. If someone you know is a layman and you want to teach him that, then I would fist ask myself, "does he want to learn this?". If he does, then start with the basics (the stuff he knows) then explain a little more in depth. If he asks questions, try and explain it in a way he can understand. Give analogies (examples) to help answer his question. Happy teaching!
2007-04-03 04:51:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lomoco 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pick up a book by Lisa Randall. The name starts with "Warped Passages" It's probably about 300 pages long and that's about how many you need to explain it.
2007-04-03 05:11:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um.. it's tricky. It would take a book.
There are quite few available which are not too technical.
2007-04-03 04:48:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by gav 4
·
0⤊
0⤋