Are you nuts, he is the worst person in the world to be a leader. He should be impeached and then tried for his crimes against the Iraqi people and his crimes against humanity and you are calling for a president for life. Thats just plain crazy and you need help. .
2007-04-03 04:12:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Assuming you're serious, I believe this is very telling about how lots of people out there define freedom and democracy.
"We can't ALLOW a Democrap [how witty] to win the white house in 2008", "I hope he establishes a Freedom Police to go after the enemies of freedom"... I'm actually going to go out on a limb and assume that you're NOT serious, that this is a tongue-in-cheek attempt to depict those who support Bush. If that's the case, I'd say it's better to just state outright that you oppose him (as I do and as countless people here do) instead of playing these little games. By the off chance that you're actually serious, however... man is your head hopelessly far up your own behind.
2007-04-03 11:16:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by David 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
There are a lot of ways to set up a dictatorship. You are looking for a legal way--usually you twist existing law, but mostly use force and political support to get away with it. I guess he could set off a nuke in Boston or come up with some national emergency on a similar scale (a mere 9-11 wouldn't qualify), declare an emergency to suspend elections for a period of time, grant himself emergency powers so he doesn't have to go thru Congress, then indefinitely suspend elections once his power base is established. That's the way you do it.
Of course, if you advocate keeping Bush in power under those kind of circumstances, all of the anti-freedom etc. programs you mention would be nothing but false names for programs that are anti-freedom themselves. And if you care so much about America that you'd ruin everything for which it stands just for a bit of personal security, you are a total wuss with no backbone and deserve whatever the capitalists, communists, terrorists, and everyone else gives you. Someday the fight may be on the homefront (and not just for one day in September), are you going to knuckle under to keep your family safe?
This isn't just a war against terror, it is a war to protect freedom--which seems to be nothing but a buzzword to you.
2007-04-03 11:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by wayfaroutthere 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a way to "cancel" the 2008 election. I think he would be abusing power which he already is doing now! In 2008, Democrats will win! And why is he in office anyway? Because of people like you, you can't even spell. I suggest you read more into the Patriot Acts, all of them.
2007-04-03 11:17:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by userdefined 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Many of the world's dictators were elected by a vote of the people and at some point they became president for life. Peron in Argentina, Amin in Uganda, Kadafi in Libya, Castro in Cuba, Adolf Hitler in Germany, Ferd Marcos in the Philippines just to name a few. Is this what you have in mind for George W. Bush?
2007-04-03 11:41:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, there is no way short of declaring marshall law and scrapping the constitution.
Democrats play on fear? They aren't the ones who sent soldiers into harms way to find WMDs that weren't there. The administration did that by terrorizing the American People and Congress with visions of nuclear and gas attacks.
Democrats are ignorant? Only if Rush Limp-baugh is right, which he almost never is. Even my conservative friends cringe when they hear his name.
A Freedom Police to arrest people expressing their opinions, which is protected speech under the constitution? Have you mistaken us for Russia, or Gemany circa 1935?
Statements like these make me yearn for an IQ police, who would arrest and confine those who make them in little rooms with crayons to play with.
2007-04-03 11:20:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Charlie S 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
you are, without a doubt, the lamest poster i've ever seen here on yahoo. that's pretty bad since i'm including the pedo stalkers and trolls of a year and a half, and the 13 year old girls asking "is my avatar pretty?" i've never seen (on this site) more blatant, unmitigated ignorance.
You are a degenerate, a frightful, bug-eyed mean-spirited poltroon. Is there a gibberish translator in the house? I cannot understand this uber-babble you fling onto the screen in your spasmodic seizure. Clearly, you spend way too much time in darkened rooms in front of your seven-year-old computer. Go outside once in a while and breathe, before your brain starts to rot from all that festering stagnation and cognitive dysfunction.
2007-04-03 11:14:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Dude, I don't think he can do that. I do agree with you about arresting all the Senate and Congress members for treason. Even most of the Republicans side with demoncrats som they are liberal and treasonous as well. I would like for Bush to stay as well, but, for the process to work like it was intended, he will have to leave office after his eight years are up. If he didn't, I think then the civil war would break out.
2007-04-03 11:38:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow, you're actually willing to give up your freedom for Bush. you say the dems have no chnace but yet advocate such a revoltuon, i think your scared. A dem will win and we will be put on the right track for a brighter future
2007-04-03 11:18:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by the 2nd woody 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is no provision in the Constitution for postponing or cancelling a presidential election, not even in time of war.
2007-04-03 11:10:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋