Is it worth the debt?
2007-04-03 03:02:20 · 5 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
reducing freedoms is a socially conservative view. I never unsderstood how reducing freedoms is conservative, but hey, it;'s not my fault that the religious right hijacked the GOP. But it doesn't prevent me from being able to answer questions. And you assume a lot about me. I am not for many social programs, just freedom. A TRUE conservative.
2007-04-03 03:15:32 · update #1
In hindsight, probably not.
But most will agree that leaving before some measure of stability is provided could force us to fight a much more costly war in the future.
2007-04-03 03:28:18 · answer #1 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
But borrowing Social Security to pay the bills all of these years is not well spent. Only two solutions: Reduced benefits or increased taxes.
2007-04-03 03:26:58 · answer #2 · answered by az 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What exactly is a "Fiscal Conservative"?
I never really got that one.
If you are at pains to declare that you are a "Fiscal" Conservative, that implies that you disagree with "Social" Conservatism, and are therefore...
Socially Liberal.
Which makes "Fiscal" Conservatism rather difficult, since IMO, Socially Liberal policies cost money.
Lot's of it.
2007-04-03 03:09:40 · answer #3 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Only if you own a lot of Blackwater stock.
2007-04-03 03:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No.
2007-04-03 03:06:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋