Dubya finally remembered that his daddy and Ronnie Reagan supplied Bin Ladin and Hussein with arms and weapons of mass destruction and he chose, instead, to ignore the warnings of the Slick Willy Administration that tired on many occasions to warn him (as White House records show, and other paper trails demonstrate to be the fact) but they were far too ignorant and arrogant to listen; 9/11 was the result, but Dubya's henchmen decided to blame Slick Willy because the mindless sheep and lemmings will go along and also blame Slick Willy.
But, this so-called "war" or whatever this contrived fiasco is called, can be easily over in a week's time if all of those mouthing off how they "support" the war would grow some testicles and stop hiding behind their women folks' skirts, picking their noses, spitting into spittoons, watching Jerry Springer and hanging out by their latrines reading The National Enquirer... too busy waiting for their surplus cheese and rations of powdered milk to enlist and volunteer to go to Iraq and Afghanistan... they TALK the talk, but are too chickenshit to WALK the walk... they'd rather send others, instead (what courage does that take?)
EDITED: Simple minds to believe that Slick Willy didn't send covert agents to get Bin Ladin and Hussein... as records show... but, they were well armed by Ronnie Reagan and daddy Bushit; Simple minds not to believe the White House records that show how Slick Willy's staffers tirelessly and repeatedly tried to meet with Dubya's staff but were left waiting and sent home on many repeated occasions... until 3 months prior to 9/11 and the gathered Intelligence was totally ignored, and the information gathered under Dubya's Administration was also ignored!
EDITED: BTW, "We" didn't find Hussein, and "Bush" did not find Hussein... he was found hiding in a hole like the rat he was BY OUR MILITARY PERSONNEL on a tip by an informmant. "WE" were not there to catch a sun burn or mosquito bite... and neither was Bushit. OUR brave and dedicated military personnel followed up on a tip and finally caught the cowardly little s.hit hiding like a latrine rat!
2007-04-03 03:04:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'll answer a question with a question.(I should have been in politics, except I'm unable to tell a lie)Q. What did the present dude in charge of Afghanistan do before the US put him in charge? A. He was the VP of Unical Oil, the company which is building the pipeline from Kazahk, and a partner of Dick Cheney. Q. Why are Canadian's dying in Afghan? A. Canadians are dying in Afghan because they support Oil and Drugs and the USA death machine. Oh yeah, also, Canadians are very ignorant. Isn't it all nice and pretty with beautiful camera's set up on every corner.
In summary, you should go to Afghanistan and meet up with some "friendly fire"
2007-04-03 04:34:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly the day of September eleventh we've been think to be going to Afghanistan to avenge what got here approximately to us. We have been going to take out a opposed rigidity that for sure confirmed it replaced into able to attacking us. even nevertheless, as former people interior the Bush administration have suggested, the Bush administration replaced into for sure disenchanted that a set of terrorists in Afghanistan had attacked us and not an evil chief of a u . s . that a presidential kinfolk had a "score" to settle with him. So whilst we charged into Afghanistan, for the sake of avenging 9/11, plans have been already in place to attack Iraq and divert interest removed from Afghanistan. As of on the instant, we are nonetheless combating the comparable terrorist cellular in Afghanistan that we've been combating in 2002 so no longer something has replaced. Afghanistan has grow to be a conflict that replaced into put in the lower back burner and forgotten approximately interior the media and by ability of the conventional public. and since the different solutions to this question for sure replicate, the clarification we are nonetheless in Afghanistan is elusive to each physique that needs to purchase into their occasion's ideals that are filled down our throats often occurring in our "media." even nevertheless, there are those people available, jointly with Nader, who know that we are there nonetheless combating a conflict we botched from the start by using fact it replaced into conflict geared up on revenge and planned carelessly by using fact it replaced into no longer the situation we needed to bypass and combat. i think Bush has in no way heard the section, "existence is what happens once you're busy making different plans."
2016-11-25 22:58:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you continue to make excuses for our Idiot King? There have been news reports stating where Binladen (or Bin Laden) and his piglet servants are likely hiding -- in the Pashtun Mountains. Rather than continue to divide Americans as a so-called "patriot," why don't you join with Americans to demand JUSTICE for 9/11?
2007-04-03 03:00:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They don't like confrontations, besides they I'm sure feel a certain amount of sympathy for him like they did Saddam!
And for all those who answered that Bush isn't going after him or isn't looking for him at least he didn't have him in his hands and let him go!!!!!! With the reasoning he wasn't a threat to us! The liberals will never ever find him and keep him!
2007-04-03 03:00:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
If someone will finance my trip, with 6 other agents I can have bin laden in custody in 6 months. Once I return his head to Bush you will be repaid plus $2 million.
2007-04-03 02:55:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
By all means YES - send them all! How is it that those who criticize continuously & claim to know everything are the ones sitting on the sofa w/ a Big Mac in one hand & a remote in the other?
2007-04-03 03:05:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well since you and the Bushies can't find him, they couldn't fare any worse now could they......oh wait, you decided not to bother finding him and instead go after a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.
2007-04-03 02:53:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
No, Bush should have kept the focus where it belonged, Bin Ladin is not in Iraq.
2007-04-03 02:53:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by ropemancometh 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
"It's hard" isn't a reason not to look.
We found Saddam in a hole in the ground in a poor section of Iraq.
The reason we can't find bin Laden is because, in order to find something, you have to be looking for it.
2007-04-03 02:53:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
6⤊
2⤋