MITB: It was Jeff Hardy and a ladder, what else could you ask for? Plus, many of the characters were right at home in this hardcore environment. 5/5
US Championship: It showcased both Porter and Benoit's technical skill. It's about time they gave Porter a little more than a cocky attitude, if you ask me. He is much more of an athlete than they portray him as. 4.5/5
Khali v Kane: Not worth mentioning. Kane could've done much better. Khali, and SIngh for that matter, both suck. 2/5
Melina v Ashley: Sort of expected. The only reason she got a push was because she was in Playboy. For the record, they could do with some actual talent in the women's division. This whole T&A thing has got to stop. 2.5/5
WHC: You can almost predict that a match with Taker would be dramatic and overall worth watching. However, seeing Batista is an up and coming superstar on his way to the top, I thought they'd give him a push then. 4/5
WC: In all honesty, nearly everyone Cena fights, carries him. Edge carried him, Hunter carried him, Jericho carried him, but what else could you expect from Mr. Mic Skills and 5 Moves of Doom? Maybe they plan to have Cena beat Sammartino's record or something, but he does not have the talent to carry the heavyweight championship. 2/5
BOTB: Umaga's current gimmick takes away from any real talent from the samoan. I can nearly imagine just how weak the match was showcased. And this match would have been the perfect cover for a well-needed makeover for the Don. 3/5
2007-04-03 02:50:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now how you gonna say something like that about Cena it was Cena that kept HBK alive all this time to challange him for the WWE Championship and no he didn't just go for the FU unlike HBK who fought dirty to win some Hero he is.... NOT at least Cena walked out of Detroit a Champ that he is all Micheals did was be a sore loser about it face it to all John Cena haters out there Cena won he was the better man than micheals was
2007-04-03 08:46:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have seen all 23 live when they appeared. Well, not in attendance for all of them but definitely on PPV or closed circuit TV when they had them for the first 5 wrestlemanias. And I hate to say but I feel it was one of the worst I have ever seen. There wasn't a highlight of the night moment for me and I felt that although I still appreciate Shawn and Taker, their days of main eventing wrestlemanias are not there anymore. It was disappointing to say the least. Edge and Randy are main eventers in a curtain jerker match. No flow, no consistency, too much McMahon and was a big let down.
Let's hope next year will be better.
2007-04-03 11:43:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Liz B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
wrestlemania 23 would have to be one of the worst wrestlemanias in the world and what was with the matchs wasnt it supposed to be taker and batista in the main event but the mathes were all over the place
2007-04-03 09:33:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by kane 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
money in bank sucked wanted Randy
kahil match sucked
at least chris won
Undertaker won loved it
melina loved it
mcmahon new it was going to happen but sucky
john match sucked
2007-04-03 09:10:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mrs.Orton RandyOrtonsBiggestFan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it wasnt fair enough(expt for the mitb)!! anyway, regardless of the results,... it's fine..
HBK IS STILL THE BEST AND I DONT CARE WHAT U ALL THINK!!!!
2007-04-03 08:45:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was the best ever
2007-04-03 09:25:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by blackcatbluetrex 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NOW YOU'RE A WWE FAN.TNA SUCKS
2007-04-05 22:21:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by BOB 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i though: DANG IT I WISH I WOULD HAVE SEEN IT!!
2007-04-03 08:42:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by undertaker dead man walking 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was ok
2007-04-07 02:45:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alexander 6
·
0⤊
0⤋