2007-04-02 23:28:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
Love isn't. Love is an emotionally attachment to something withough need or want of something more. If you truly want to know if you love someone, take away everything and if you notice that nothing has changed...then you are in love.
People who marry for money, standing, or power, are only using it to further themselves. To be selfish and in love can never happy. Because you want nothing more than to make the other happy. It is that unselfishness that we realize that true love exist.
2007-04-02 23:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by Dream V 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol. I guess you missed my last question.
Anyways, yes. And to some extent reasonably. Security is important in many areas including money. But for many couples any money above and beyond what they need to live is a liability rather than an asset. The more money you have the more fights you can get into about how to spend it. True love wouldn't actually be affected by money at all, even if there wasn't enough to go around. But as far as what most Americans know as love, yeah it matters.
2007-04-03 06:35:05 · answer #2 · answered by Meatball ;) sub 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the situations. Sometimes severe financial situations can break or create a clash in the relationship. But if we sort out matters with cool mind there is always a way. Only thing we must have is the will power. Love can bring miracles in life. But everyone doesn't have the chance to get sincere love. If the love for others is from the bottom of your heart, then money cannot affect it.
2007-04-03 06:46:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anita Suranga G 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
True love is not affected by money, however, there are some people who feel that money is a must for them to love someone. These people are very superficial and I don't believe the love is real. Real love can survive being poor as well as being wealthy. Money, to me, has nothing to do with love.
2007-04-03 11:47:59 · answer #4 · answered by vanhammer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People loved each other when there was no money. People with money love each other. So, love is money neutral. But when love is introduced in the market as commodity or service, it can be affected by changes in money supply and also affect the demand for money. Both the demand for love and supply of love are influenecd by the liquidity in the love market. The prices of different varities of love depend on demand and supply.
2007-04-03 16:41:26 · answer #5 · answered by sensekonomikx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it is affected by money, then never name it as love.
2007-04-03 06:57:02 · answer #6 · answered by tdrajagopal 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NOPE, its not necessary....
it is true that some person fall in love only for money ....
but it doesn't mean all love of the world is affected by money..
2007-04-06 06:18:55 · answer #7 · answered by kajal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way.
In the Bible it says that if an unbeliever invites you to a meal, go if you want to. But if they offer you food sacrificed to idols, don't eat it on account of their conscience. This is because food is seen to be associated with converting people to spiritual business deals if you're dealing with somebody of a different faith.
This is where money comes into it. Money is morally neutral. So long as you make it honestly, you're allowed to spend it any way you like. You might also like to apply the analogy of the food. I don't know. But it's a business deal. That's all.
Love is rest and peace and security, not keeping busy.
2007-04-03 06:32:56 · answer #8 · answered by courage 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true love is not affected by money. true love is unconditional. money can come and go. money may be a cause that a relationship doesnt work, but it doesnt affect the love.
2007-04-03 06:39:33 · answer #9 · answered by UT ALII VIVAT 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yah i suppose...love is affected with money and a number of other things added to the money lust.
like aspirations to exceed, to make others defeat, selfishness-even if it include teh loved ones.
2007-04-03 14:01:35 · answer #10 · answered by intrigued 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋