Mankind is at the super stage of achievement. Sience is going to Mars.
Still people in the earth sterving, So many deseases got no answere. More than half of the population passing hand to mouth life. World leaders are roaring each other. Giants are grabing the smalls . Why we can not think about a peaceful,healty and wealthy life for the world. Who should come forward first?
2007-04-02 22:23:23 · 10 answers · asked by Yongman 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Collision with the Andromeda Galaxy...
2007-04-04 19:53:44 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's right; this is a world of differences...It has always been
so and I suppose nothing much can change in this sense...
There are 6 billions people on this planet, and we have become a threat to life on Earth...Through the eye of life, we're
a disease...Peace is something contrary to human nature, in
fact it is contrary to life in general, there's no such a thing as
peaceful or still life is - it only exists on paintings...Life is a
dynamic process, everything alive from a microbe to a human
being is driven by the same logic, that is growth, mating, and finally death...
2007-04-03 06:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by javornik1270 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not just about the food. People get swallowing difficulties when they don't understand. They really do need to be prayed for.
Organised religion likes taking a tithe or some other offering. Earthy religion means putting offerings for your guilt back into the earth (in the form of grain, usually) or somewhere where it is going back to your ancestors. This would explain Marie Antoinette's "let them eat cake". Given free will, can you stop people doing that? You need to let them know that eating is good. Psalms 50 says that all God wants is a thank offering. He could take things from the earth if that's what he wanted. People find it easier to eat guilt-free if they just realise that God wants them to.
2007-04-03 05:59:11 · answer #3 · answered by courage 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can we assume that going to Mars is an effort towards finding solution to our problems on earth? We cant take a minimalist approach just because there is suffering on earth. Science or philosophy then would remain stagnant and mankind doesnt make any progress. Travel to Mars, explore the difficulties to realize how heavenly our little planet is to live in provided we dont make it a hell.
2007-04-03 05:29:56 · answer #4 · answered by surnell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. We'll have to wait it out and see. I just try to live life the best that I can and help make others healthy and happy and then whatever happens at least I know I did my best.
Everyone has different priorities and values and some of us have more money and influence than others of us. That's what it seems to come down to.
I think there's a lot more wonderment, beauty, disgust and ugliness to come.
2007-04-03 05:58:36 · answer #5 · answered by HerbGal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at the rate we are going mankind is soon going to be extinct and it will be out of our own ndeeds this thing called advancement is really a drawback even though some are usefull idont see the use of going to mars when people are dying of hunger all over the globewhen a quater of the budget on space travel could feed them for decades
2007-04-03 05:31:01 · answer #6 · answered by ibro 47 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have lost our wisdom an love. There is no destination, because we know nothing about the way. Some people rule us and we obey. That's all
2007-04-03 11:19:15 · answer #7 · answered by Poetique 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Infinity.
2007-04-03 08:21:01 · answer #8 · answered by Alex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One destination lies for us all, destruction.
Unless we repent now to our God and accept His only Son Jesus Christ.
2007-04-03 05:32:42 · answer #9 · answered by JD 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
heaven or hell all depend how you life your life
2007-04-03 10:01:21 · answer #10 · answered by RED ROSE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋