2007-04-02 18:18:52 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ronald Reagan already took care of that problem long a go with his sale of Air Craft to the Iranians and stockpiles of small arm weapons. You do remember Oliver North and the Iran Contra scandal that Bush senior pardoned all those criminals over, don't ya?
2007-04-02 18:33:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Maybe Clinton could have done something to prevent Iran from becoming so powerful. Like prevent Bush from going into Iraq for example. Alas hindsight is 20/20.
2007-04-02 18:52:47 · answer #2 · answered by brickity hussein brack 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, why didn't Ronnie Reagan and Bushit Sr do something in the 12 years preceding Slick Willy and why hasn't Dubya Bushit in his 6 years done squat...? That's 18 years of Republicans (and, by the way, it was both Ronnie and Bushit Sr that were arming those countries that are now our enemies, including Hussein) and just 8 years of Slick Willy...! Instead of Dubya attacking Iraq or Afghanistan, why didn't Dubya Bushit go after Iran?
You seem to forget one minor detail... Republicans gave arms to our enemies and for your information, Slick Willy AIN'T the President anymore, and he can't be re-elected again to undo the mess Dubya and the other Republicans have caused.
EDITED: priorityze_ur_lyf, thanks for bringing up the Iran Contra Scandal... you beat me to the punch. It seems that our Repuke "friends" have faulty memories... or is it just plain SELECTIVE memory? Dubya has been too busy taking vacations...!
2007-04-02 18:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The real problem was that dummy Carter in 1979
2007-04-06 13:12:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he was busy doing other very important things like helping South Ireland!
2007-04-02 18:42:36 · answer #5 · answered by pvtlandrum 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because Bill was to busy sodomizing Monica Lewinsky with a cigar in the oval office.when he did try to do something Presidenshal he was a total falure and then he passed it all off to G.W. Bush to deal with. G.W. isn't perfect but he is doing a better job than Clinton did.
2007-04-02 18:51:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hey, I despise Clinton. He was a lazy do nothing, worthless president, but how about Carter, (he started this whole thing) Reagan and Bush1
2007-04-02 18:33:27 · answer #7 · answered by Kye H 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why did the NeoGod Reagan appease them by selling them weapons? We can go right on back in history as far as you want to prove small minded hatred for liberals is justified - but I can do the same for cons. Wanna history lesson?
2007-04-02 18:24:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
What? Conservatives screwed up!? Wait, who was the last Liberal president!? Hurry, we need a scapegoat!
2007-04-03 04:32:08 · answer #9 · answered by Ferret 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you kidding? Why did we attack Iraq rather than Iran. BTW whats up with all the capital letters?
2007-04-02 18:30:34 · answer #10 · answered by Creepy Uncle 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋