Which was better?
2007-04-02 17:40:22 · 9 answers · asked by Nitz Frugent 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Dr. Love, normally here I'd tear you a new one, but you correctly answered the question.
2007-04-02 17:48:26 · update #1
Dumb and Dumber for sure!
2007-04-02 20:12:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Young Frankenstein!
2007-04-03 00:44:53 · answer #2 · answered by noonecanne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Young Frankenstein
2007-04-03 00:44:03 · answer #3 · answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Frankenstein
2007-04-03 00:43:56 · answer #4 · answered by mamacedar 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's like comparing apples and seaweed. I absolutely loved Young Frankenstein! Couldn't sit through five minutes of Dumb and Dumber, and even told my bf at the time that he was Dumbest for renting it!
:D
2007-04-03 00:50:42 · answer #5 · answered by OneRedCent 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOW, I'M NOT ADVOCATING GETTING HIGH, BUT ...
Saw it Stoned my first time. The second time I was straight. I swear, it was a different movie and I laughed at so many different things.
Young Frankenstein was Mel Brooks best and Marty Feldon's best, and so many one liner's that cause your tummy muscles to tighten, you can lose 4 or 5 pounds in one sitting.
What knocker's!! Thank you Doctor,
Eye-gor take the bags up to the bedroom You take the blond and I'll ...
A sophisticated ... man about town.
Wasn't your hump on the other side? What hump?
How about a cigar for an after dinner smoke?
What else can we throw into the well?
2007-04-03 00:54:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Young Frankenstein! It's hilarious. Dumb and Dumber is just well... dumb.
2007-04-03 01:25:27 · answer #7 · answered by K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mel Brooks, Gene Wilder, and Peter Boyle = no contest. Young Frankenstein, obviously.
2007-04-03 00:42:41 · answer #8 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dunb ot dumer
2007-04-03 00:42:37 · answer #9 · answered by amberharris20022000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋