Maybe because the blast waves would have caused release of the millions of tons of nerve gas and anthrax that Saddam was hiding in his basement.
2007-04-02 15:20:04 · 9 answers · asked by Bella Bruda 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
But their were no hijackers!
You/Nancy/Crypto Jew Girl/Nick/Surfer Dude/Skip/Ginger/Brenda/Sgt BMF/etc. have finally convinced everyone. It was all Bush and the plans that he developed at Bohemian Grove. It was touch and go for a while but Larry Silverstein and Marvin Bush, acting on Cheney's orders, were able to pull it off.
And then they moved on to New Orleans where, using the same controlled demolition technology, they took out the levee's under the guise of a Hurricane.
These men have no shame. They will stop at nothing. Wake up America! Wake up before it is too late!
lol
2007-04-02 15:28:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
19 hijackers held SAUDI passports.
2007-04-02 15:26:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because then they couldn't steal the oil.
2007-04-02 16:48:22 · answer #3 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your line of questions is disturbing. Nuking is not the answer.
2007-04-02 15:23:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
meow,sassikat say,s it right,and I add ,they had Saudi passports,and eye makeup on.I'm not much on nuc,s..cheers
2007-04-02 15:34:00 · answer #5 · answered by decider JR 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nice trolling...comedy gold!
2007-04-02 15:24:30 · answer #6 · answered by answer faerie, V.T., A. M. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For all you DUMB CONS
let me you inform you this.
THIS IS A RHETORICAL QUESTION, not an actual one.
2007-04-02 15:23:48 · answer #7 · answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
sarcasm is one thing,, but not this,,, it's a lie,, are you with the Bush administration,,,,,
2007-04-02 15:25:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are a total loser!
2007-04-02 15:23:18 · answer #9 · answered by Katz 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋