Let's see: we need to surrender to al qaeda, the insurgents, and the Taliban for starters, right? Will it include promises not to invade Cuba, North Korea, Iran, or Venezuela?
2007-04-02 15:15:35 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Reach out, and touch a nerve!! How predictably they rise to the bait! I wish fish were so easy. I ask this kind of annoying question once in a while as a riposte to all the bushhater postings that are just as stupid and irritating. Shame on me, but it is interesting to see what kind of responses you get.
2007-04-02 22:01:12 · update #1
Not only have they drafted the surrender papers (in a high-gloss format), they have planned the big post-defeat celebration in Havana with Fidel Castro, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez as the guests of honor.
The crowds will be treated to the comedic stylings of Geneane Garafalo with a concert by the Dixie Chicks.
2007-04-02 15:30:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, Bush's plan of defeating the insurgents in Iraq has been a miserable failure. Iraqi civilians continue to be murdered by the hundreds every month, and US troops continue dying trying to protect an Iraqi government that embraces torture and is joined to Iran at the hip. The reality is, if Bush wasn't solely responsible for this government existing, he would be lumping them in with Iran and North Korea as enemies of America. The Maliki government has made no attempt to take a serious role in assuming control of his country's security. When he promises to send 10 brigades to assist us on sweeps, only 2 show up. By giving him a firm deadline, he can either decide to get serious, or get his *** kicked by the insurgents.
2007-04-02 15:23:56 · answer #2 · answered by truth be told 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
an major try of Mr. Bush’s persisted carry over his celebration will are available in September, at the same time as his troop buildup in Iraq will be re-evaluated on Capitol Hill, and he will very almost genuinely face Republican rigidity to shift route. Senators Richard G. Lugar of Indiana and George V. Voinovich of Ohio argued for a sparkling course this week. Even Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican chief, has strongly suggested Republicans will call for a replace. “i imagine that the handwriting is on the wall that we are entering into a diverse course in the autumn,” Mr. McConnell instructed journalists very last month, “and that i assume the president to steer it.” Its a shame that the yahoo Republicans do exactly not prefer to end their blood shed in Iraq...isn't it?
2016-12-03 04:16:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was your stinking money loving government that got us into trouble with those folks to start with. The US government laughs at how easy it was to get fools like you to support their cause.
2007-04-02 15:22:06 · answer #4 · answered by warning 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A lot of ifs, ands and buts. Since you seem to know all there is about it, maybe Bush and Cheney will let you do it.
2007-04-02 15:26:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because life is completely black and white. Our only two choices are to bomb everyone in the world, or to surrender to everyone in the world.
Asshat.
2007-04-02 15:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by raleigh_jazz_fan 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Your right we need to stay in Iraq no matter the cost
2007-04-02 15:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i'd like to translate for those of us not well versed in neocon idiot speak.
here's what the above post means in english:
duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
2007-04-02 15:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Have you received your eviction notice from the trailer park yet?
2007-04-02 15:21:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
quick get in your bomb shelter i think a muslim is about to fart
2007-04-02 15:20:44 · answer #10 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋