English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So even the Supreme Court says we need to worry about Global Warming huh?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070402/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_greenhouse_gases;_ylt=AnJATjeyFQRtR4EAaqybfXWyFz4D

2007-04-02 13:36:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

My comrade nice direct answer, me thinks you doth protest too much, having to face reality sucks doesn't it

2007-04-02 13:40:58 · update #1

PARANOIA. RUN RUN RUN RUN RUN

TERRORISTS ARE COMIN AFTER US ALL. FEAR FACTOR OF THE RIGHT

2007-04-02 13:41:54 · update #2

SocialD there is not a single person who doesn't think this is a right leaning court just because 4 of the 5 conservatives happen to swerve harder right than one doesn't make him any less of a Conservative, perhaps just not an extreme one, also how many of the current Justices were appointed by conservatives? My either conservatism has changed for the worse or being a Justice liberalizes you, at least there's a couple of conclusions I could reach

2007-04-02 13:51:51 · update #3

Also let's face it these days 5-4 is as good as the court gets the bulk of thier decisions are this modest majority's perhaps that's all that's left of consensus in this Country

2007-04-02 13:53:13 · update #4

Locutus did you even read more than the headline? Oh wait your a Fox viewer aren't you to hell with the substance just give me a talking point

2007-04-02 15:26:22 · update #5

11 answers

They will find some way to deny it. Probably say the Supreme Court is liberal. Dont forget if it doesnt confirm their views it is liberally biased.

2007-04-02 13:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2 3

it really is a robust ruling. the student team wanted valid attractiveness from the college (and the money that pass alongside with that attractiveness), yet refused to learn in to the college's non-discrimination coverage, which all student communities ought to do as a fashion to achieve valid attractiveness. at the same time as the college suggested, "sorry, yet no contract, no attractiveness, undemanding as that", the student regulation team sued for non secular discrimination. The courtroom were given it easily proper; you won't be able to have it both methods and get a particular exemption. I merely choose this wasn't yet another 5-4 decision; meaning the issue is going to come back up back, at the same time as someone thinks the composition of the courtroom is more advantageous "favorable" to their argument. @MM: honest adequate factor about federal money, yet extremely some the money in question the following got here from a pool that became funded by technique of "student interest expenditures" that all and sundry on the college will pay into as area of the traditional classes price. The college has the non-discrimination coverage in position precisely so a discriminatory team does no longer be funded by technique of the very scholars who it excludes, which may be exceedingly perverse, yeah?

2016-12-03 04:11:17 · answer #2 · answered by pires 4 · 0 0

If you read the article, you'll find that it was a 5-4 decision. Roberts, Alito, and two other conservative justices voted against it, for various reasons of procedure. But it's a fairly good vote that give Congress power to act on this subject without having to worry about their laws getting struck down.

It's still an EPA decision. But a lot of the smoke and mirrors the administration has used to try to hold them up just got trashed.

2007-04-02 14:07:58 · answer #3 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1 1

You didn't read your own article!! All of the conservative right leaning judges dissented. I guess next you would like them to mandate how many breaths a day you can take!

The court's four conservative justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — dissented

2007-04-02 13:42:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

High Court rebukes Bush on car pollution ; Not global warming. Last time I looked judges weren't scientists and neither is Gore.

2007-04-02 13:57:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

Right leaning supreme court? where have you been?

and it was a 5-4 decision... hardly compelling.

2007-04-02 13:48:33 · answer #6 · answered by sociald 7 · 1 0

It does look that way, doesn't it. I was surprised. This is the second time in a month they decided against Bush.

2007-04-02 13:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They only believe what Faux and hate radio fill their empty little heads with.

2007-04-02 13:41:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

since righties are so liberal, you wouldn't be waiting for a smart answer.

2007-04-02 15:38:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The tide is turning!

2007-04-02 13:43:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers