It is highly suspicious that a building would collapse when dozens of others around the world burned t the point where just the steal shell survived .
This is all I am saying not That the government had anything to do with it . Could have been business interests .
That have loyal paid security and special needs personnel on staff .
Like to handle foreign kidnappings and murders of corporate executives .
2007-04-02 12:10:44 · 15 answers · asked by trouble maker 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
WTC Building 7 is the smoking gun of 911. So is the missile that struck the Pentagon.
2007-04-02 12:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by Ugly Betty 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Want the reason for 7WTC falling?
When that idiot Giuliani became mayor, he promptly made 7 WTC the command and control center for NYC (nicknamed "the bunker") in case of an emergency. Mind you this was AFTER the first attack in '93, and while the World Trade Center was the biggest target on the planet.
Anyway, by being the "bunker" (it was above ground) generators were installed to deal with power outages.These generators worked on diesel fuel, which was stored in gravity tanks a few floors above (I forget which floors were part of the bunker, but they were higher up) and contained upwards of 65,000 gallons. I'm SURE that contributed a great deal to the reason that building fell.
There were other factors, one being that the building was actually built cantilevered over a Con Ed (NYC electric company) substation.
Why ANYONE in their right mind would consider this idiot as a presidential candidate is beyond me...... Hillary sucked up to a terrorist, Yasser Arafat, and is about the biggest political whore on the plant. Giuliani is an incompetent fool with more skeletons in his closet than a morgue......
Edit,
7 WTC did not "implode" it actually burned and collapsed on top of the rubble.
The missing part of the building like 20 or so stories up is consistent with one of those gravity tanks exploding
I have NOTHING but respect for the 9-11 families, I knew over 100 of the victims, probably the worst day of my life, and no one from 7 actually died, the building was empty when it started burning.
Lastly before someone calls me a "conspiracy theorist" I'm not and don't believe the government staged this in anyway shape or form. I do believe that one building did collapse due to GROSS incompetence.
2007-04-02 19:27:47 · answer #2 · answered by free_eagle716 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it's not that we "defenders of America" want to discredit what you may believe, we just don't want in shoved down our throats daily, There is no concrete evidence to prove that there was anything other than 2 airplanes that caused all that to happen. If you and people like you want to believe in this you have that right as an American Citizen... But for the love of God and the respect for the families of 9/11 quit accusing our government (not that you did here but many do) of doing such an unthinkable act.
I don't think I would have such a problem with it if people weren't so willing to through our government in the fire over something that can't prove. If those same people would just simply say, it is mysterious how the towers came down and it needs to be investigated further for what ever reasons, I wouldn't even blink an eye at it.. But they have to automatically accuse The current administration in a conspiracy!!!
2007-04-02 19:19:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
There is really no way that building 7 imploded like it did. Admit, people, that this type of collapse is consistent only with demolition. Once you have finally seen the correctness of this view you may want to find out what really happened.
Even with the huge damage to the building in Oklahoma showed no signs of collapse. The collapse could not happen especially in the way it did.
2007-04-02 19:17:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you look at the photo's of Bldg 7 you will see the huge gaping hole of like 20 stories of damage it took from the blast off of 1&2. The base of 7 also took major damage in the bottom corner, this is was gave way and the building collapsed. Very simple.
Did you also know that it takes 4+ months to wire a building to demolition and that is only a 12 story building that is empty. Do do one of those building would have taken over a year and would have been noticed. Let's use a little common sense here folks.
2007-04-02 19:18:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes, I'm sure that Bush did that also. Hel*, some little Mexican kid her got caught burning cats alive; he blamed it on George and the Dem jury let him off! LOL
How about something different for a change.
Right on Theodore, you've said what I wanted to say.
2007-04-02 19:17:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Gullible and naive people think our government would never do such a thing....yeah right. To this administration ... the end justifies the means>
2007-04-02 19:18:15 · answer #7 · answered by jdoh10 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Check out any program on demolition, like on TLC or Discovery.
The amount of work it takes to prepare a building for demolition, would NEVER go un-noticed in an office environment.
It just is impossible to covertly drill through hundreds of beams and hide miles of wires without anyone working in those buildings knowing about it.
Sorry, but I have yet to see, hear, or read any CREDIBLE argument levied against the 9/11 commissions conclusions.
2007-04-02 19:16:58 · answer #8 · answered by Skyhawk 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Defenders of America, I like that, besides the legion of kook
theories, does a far better job of discrediting, their own plots.
2007-04-02 19:16:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Steel loses it's temper in high temperatures like aviation fuel.
It also had a plane going 800 mph hit it.
2007-04-02 19:13:35 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋